CCE in the News

Gov. Cuomo's Plastic Bag Ban Proposal Draws Concern, Mixed Support

Source: WAER

Gov. Cuomo's Plastic Bag Ban Proposal Draws Concern, Mixed Support

BY SCOTT WILLIS

Posted: January 21, 2019
Originally Published: January 17, 2019

Governor Cuomo unveiled a number of environmental priorities this week in his state of the state address, including one that’s been a bit more controversial.

"You look at the damage done by plastic bags, it is everywhere, hanging from trees, in water, in every community across the state. Let's once and for all step up, I know it isn't easy, I know everyone has an opinion. Let's ban plastic bags once and for all," Cuomo said to applause on Tuesday. 

Mike Durant is President of the Food Industry Alliance of New York, which represents the state’s supermarkets. 

"The plastic bag ban is probably the number one issue of concern for the retail food industry of New York."


He says they’ve been a champion of encouraging customers to recycle plastic bags and switch to reusable ones. But Durant thinks the governor’s plan will cause shoppers to ask for paper bags, which have a higher carbon footprint when you factor in manufacturing, shipping, and storage.

"Just by putting a ban on one is not going to drive consumers to buy or take advantage of reusable bag giveaways. A more sustainable solution to help the environment and the industry would be to address paper and plastic in a variety of different ways."

Hanna Ring agrees the governor's proposal needs to address paper bags. She's CNY program coordinator at Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

"We definitely would need a ban on plastic bags coupled with a five cent fee on paper bags in order to effectively change public behavior. It's critical that we don't solve the plastic bag problem by just exacerbating another problem."


Suffolk County on Long Island has the toughest local law so far; stores there charge a fee for both plastic and paper bags. Durant with the Food Industry Alliance says that resulted in an 80 percent increase the adoption of reusable bags. Ring with the CCE says it’s a great example of how fees can work, but an outright ban on plastic bags is the best way for the state to address a serious environmental problem.

Listen to the story.


Cuomo pushes plastic bag ban

Source: The River Reporter

Cuomo pushes plastic bag ban

Bottle Bill would expand

BY FRITZ MAYER

Posted: January 21, 2019
Originally Published: January 16, 2019

ALBANY, NY — Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced legislation on January 13 that would ban most single-use plastic bags in the state, to be included as part of his proposed 2019 budget. In making the announcement, he once again contrasted environmental actions in Albany against those taking place in Washington, D.C.

“While the federal government is taking our environmental progress backwards and selling out our communities to polluters and oil companies, in New York we are moving forward with the nation’s strongest environmental policies and doing everything in our power to protect our natural resources for future generations,” Cuomo said. He went on to say that the bag ban, along with the proposed expansion of the Bottle Bill, “will reduce litter in our communities, protect our water and create a cleaner and greener New York for all.”

The move comes nearly two years after the governor blocked a plan by New York City officials that would have instituted a five-cent fee on plastic bags in the city. Cuomo said at the time that the plan was flawed and would allow merchants to keep the fee as profit, which could have amounted to $100 million. Cuomo promised to establish “a state-wide task force to develop a uniform state plan for addressing the plastic bag problem.”

The Plastic Bag Task Force released a report on January 13, which estimated that New Yorkers use 23 billion plastic bags annually. “Single-use plastic bags are a detriment to the health of communities and the environment alike,” the report concluded. “From the significant recycling and disposal issues they pose as litter and the harm they create to wildlife, their negative impacts can be seen daily.”

Cuomo said his legislation would also include an expansion of the Bottle Bill, which was first passed by the legislature 30 years ago. Cuomo said the legislation has since diverted 320 million tons of glass and plastic and other recyclables away from landfills, and reduced the release of one billion metric tons of carbon dioxide that would have been required to create the bottles to replace those that have been recycled.

Now, Cuomo is proposing to add most non-alcoholic beverage containers, such as those containing sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit and vegetable beverages and iced tea, to the list of containers which have a five-cent redemption value. The bottle bill expansion would have some exemptions for bottles containing dairy milk, milk substitutes, infant formula, syrups and flavorings, medical prescriptions and dietary supplements.

Environmental groups hailed Cuomo’s initiative, but also called for simultaneously instituting a fee on paper bags when plastic bags are banned. “This is the beginning of the end for the scourge of plastic bag pollution in New York. However, experience shows that a fee on paper bags must accompany the proposed ban on plastic bags, to avoid a serious increase in paper waste and pollution,” said a joint statement from the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Riverkeeper.

Cuomo budget to include statewide ban on single-use plastic bags

Source: Riverhead Local

Cuomo budget to include statewide ban on single-use plastic bags

BY DENISE CIVILETTI

Posted: January 16, 2019
Originally Published: January 14, 2019

Single-use plastic bags would be banned statewide under a new proposal being advanced by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

The governor yesterday announced his intention to include the ban in his 2019 executive budget. He also announced that his budget will include an expansion of the state’s bottle bill to make most non-alcoholic drink containers eligible for 5-cent redemption.

The single-use plastic bag ban will help reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with plastic bag production and disposal, from petroleum used to produce the bags to emissions from the transportation of bags to landfills, the governor’s office said in a statement. New Yorkers use billions of plastic bags annually, according to the statement.

Environmental advocacy groups welcomed the initiative.

“This is the beginning of the end for the scourge of plastic bag pollution in New York,” Citizens Campaign for the Environment, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Riverkeeper said in a joint statement.

But the organizations called for a mandatory fee on paper bags “to avoid a serious increase in paper waste and pollution.”

A 5-cent fee on single-use plastic bags went into effect in Suffolk on Jan. 1, 2018 and the law had a dramatic impact on consumer behavior, according to Citizens Campaign for the Environment, which advocated for its passage.

The group conducted surveys at grocery stores across Suffolk County, one just before the law took effect and a second one on the weekend of April 7-8. Teams of volunteers observed 20,000 people in December 2017 and 6,000 people in April.

Prior to the 5-cent bag fee law, 71 percent of the public were using plastic bags in December, according to CCE. In April, only 30 percent of the public were taking plastic bags. Reusable bag use shot up from 6 percent of shoppers to 43 percent, the organization said. Shoppers who didn’t bring reusable bags often carried out items without any bags, the survey found.

Cuomo opposed a plastic bag fee enacted by New York City in 2017 and with state legislators stepped in to block its implementation. He created a state task force to develop a statewide solution, but it failed to reach a consensus.

Last year Cuomo introduced a program bill to ban single-use carryout plastic bags statewide. That bill would have pre-empted local government’s authority to adopt laws like Suffolk’s. It failed to gain support of some environmental advocates and faced bipartisan opposition in the legislature.

The governor’s office did not release text of his new proposal or any additional details. Cuomo is scheduled to give his “state of the state” address tonight.

The State Department of Environmental Conservation will “work with stakeholders and community leaders to ensure the roll-out of this initiative does not disproportionately impact low and moderate income and environmental justice communities through the distribution of reusable bags and exemptions where appropriate,” according to the statement released yesterday.

Plastic bag ban to be included in Governor Cuomo's 2019 Executive Budget

Source: WKBW Buffalo

Plastic bag ban to be included in Governor Cuomo's 2019 Executive Budget

BY ANTHONY REYES

Posted: January 15, 2019
Originally Published: January 14, 2019

NEW YORK, N.Y. (WKBW) — New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Sunday a ban on single-use plastic bags will be included in his 2019 Executive Budget.

Cuomo says New Yorkers use billions of single-use plastic bags annually which are not biodegradable, create massive amounts of litter, and pose a threat to New York residents health.

Members of the WNY Environmental Alliance told 7 Eyewitness News Reporter Ed Reilly they were happy with the Governor's actions.

"The have been a scourge on environment for far too long. Not only do we see plastic bags littering our parks and our communities, but plastic bags are ending up in our Great Lakes," said Brian Smith, Associate Executive Director for the Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

Changing the rules on plastic bags will have an impact on local grocery stores.

Tops issued the following statement:

"Tops Friendly Markets has always and will continue to abide by any legislation set forth by the communities we serve," said Kathy Sautter, public and media relations manager for Tops Friendly Markets. “We ramped up our plastic bag recycling efforts over the past few years to include multiple recycle bins, increasing the distribution of reusable shopping bags while encouraging customers to use them more frequently, and encouraging the use of insulated bags even outside of their shopping experience for other activities (i.e. picnics, the beach, theme parks) in place of plastic bags. In 2018, Tops recycled more than 640 tons of plastic.”


Wegmans was reserving comment on the idea until it has the "chance to thoroughly review the details of the Governor's proposal to understand its scope and impact."

Governor Cuomo sought, unsuccessfully, to get plastic bags banned in 2018.

At that time, Wegmans expressed concerns with banning all plastic bags, which it felt were an environmentally better choice than paper bags.

The supermarket chain said its plastic bags were made from 40% recycled plastic that was returned to the stores by customers - with close to a 50% recycling rate for bags in 2017.

Wegmans felt the best and most environmentally friendly choice was the use of reuseable bags.

Reporter Ed Reilly has more on the issue in the attached report.

-----------------------------------------------

The Governor also announced a proposed expansion of the Bottle Bill, which would make most non-alcoholic drink containers eligible for five cent redemption.

The new Bottle Bill proposal would include sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit and vegetable juices, and ready-to-drink teas and coffee eligible for five cent redemption.

"While the federal government is taking our environmental progress backwards and selling out our communities to polluters and oil companies, in New York we are moving forward with the nation's strongest environmental policies and doing everything in our power to protect our natural resources for future generations," Governor Cuomo said. "These bold actions to ban plastic bags and promote recycling will reduce litter in our communities, protect our water and create a cleaner and greener New York for all."

Saturday, Cuomo announced a proposal to increase the minimum sales age for tobacco and e-cigarettes products from 18-years-old to 21-years-old will also be included in his 2019 Executive Budget.

Watch the video.

Cuomo wants statewide plastic bag ban, more redeemable bottles

Source: Newsday

Cuomo wants statewide plastic bag ban, more redeemable bottles

Environmental advocates and grocery lobbyists are concerned that shoppers would start using free paper bags or thicker plastic bags, both exempt from the proposal.

BY DAVID M. SCHWARTZ

Posted: January 14, 2019
Originally Published: January 14, 2019

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Sunday proposed a statewide ban on thin plastic bags at store checkouts but would leave paper bags unregulated by the state, sparking concern from environmentalists and grocery stores that shoppers will simply switch their disposable bag habits.

Aimed at encouraging shoppers to bring reusable bags, Cuomo's plastic bag ban would replace 5-cent fees in Suffolk County, Long Beach and other areas where local governments have passed fees in recent years to reduce bag waste.

Paper bags wouldn't be affected under Cuomo's proposal, although local governments could impose their own.

Cuomo also proposed Sunday that sports drinks, energy drinks and fruit and vegetable juices be included under the 5-cent deposit program. He said he also will direct the state Department of Environmental Conservation to study whether to add wine and liquor bottles to the deposit program.
Cuomo, in a news release, said the proposals "will reduce litter in our communities, protect our water and create a cleaner and greener New York for all."

Environmental advocates and the grocery store lobbyists expressed concern that shoppers would start using free paper bags, which cost more to transport and store, or thicker plastic bags that are exempt from the ban.

Chicago instituted a plastic bag ban in 2015, but dropped it 16 months later in favor of a 7-cent fee after stores and shoppers simply used paper bags.

"This needs to be coupled with a fee on paper bags, so as not to trigger a shift from plastic to paper, which has its own environmental concerns," said Eric A. Goldstein, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, based in Manhattan. He said the plastic ban "heads in the right direction. It can help reverse the ever-growing tide of plastic trash."

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, also said there should eventually be a fee on paper bags.

“The goal here is to change public behavior, so they’re not using paper or plastic. This is a good step. This is the beginning of the death of plastic bag pollution," she said.

Business groups and grocery stores said they opposed Cuomo's plastic bag ban.

"The Business Council is concerned that these proposals will come at considerable cost to consumers and businesses and will do little, if anything, to address the municipal solid waste issues of the State," Darren Suarez, director of government affairs for The Business Council of New York State, said in an email on Sunday. He said "contrary to the rhetoric," the ban could increase emissions because it costs more to transport paper bags than plastic ones.

Michael Durant, president and CEO of the Food Industry Alliance of New York State, said the group "will strongly oppose" Cuomo's bag proposal. "All evidence points to the simple fact that a plastic bag ban will not effectively impact the environment positively when paper bags are not addressed, as well," he said.

Cuomo said the proposal will be included in his executive budget.

Local governments on Long Island have implemented local fees to try to combat waste from plastic bags, which environmentalists say litter highways and waterways, are made with fossil fuels and jam recycling systems. While the Suffolk Legislature has imposed a 5-cent fee on paper and plastic since 2018 — in which the money is kept by the stores — a similar proposal in Nassau County has been stalled by the Republican-controlled Legislature, which worried about its cost to consumers.

State plastic bag bans have been bandied about before in Albany, but they were stalled in the State Senate where Republicans had control. Democrats took charge this year.

State Sen. Todd Kaminsky (D-Long Beach), the new head of his chamber's Environmental Conservation Committee, has introduced a bill that would ban plastic carryout bags and put a 10-cent fee on paper bags and reusable bags sold at checkouts, with the money directed to a state environmental fund.

“To Governor Cuomo’s credit, this budget should be a vehicle to advance innovative and bold ideas to protect our environment," Kaminsky said in a statement. "I am proud to carry plastic bag legislation in the Senate that also addresses paper bags, something I will continue to advocate for during this process."

Legis. William Spencer (D-Centerport), who had sponsored Suffolk County's bag fee, said he supported Cuomo's proposal. "The plan is that they’re going to ban the plastic. So I’m excited," he said. "I think we had a good result here in Suffolk with a fee."

Sen. Phil Boyle (R-Bay Shore), the ranking Republican on the State Senate environment committee, said he supported Cuomo's proposal. "These plastic bags have been an environmental nightmare for far too long. It's the best way to clean up oceans and landscapes."

Governor Cuomo pushing to ban plastic bags across NY state

Source: WIVB Buffalo

Governor Cuomo pushing to ban plastic bags across NY state

Posted: January 14, 2019
Originally Published: January 14, 2019

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) - "I think it's a good idea I'd love to see plastic out of the environment. I think we're too reliant on plastic in everything in our lives," said Genevieve Rados of Buffalo.

"I have been using plastic bags but my wife and I always recycle," said Michael Mirand of Buffalo.

Some customers like Michael Mirand enjoy the convenience of plastic bags while shopping for groceries, but he ultimately doesn't support how plastic impacts the environment.

"It's probably good just to suck it up and get rid of them" said Mirand.

This may become reality across New York state. Governor Cuomo is including provisions in his executive budget for 2019 to ban single-use plastic bags.

"We see them littering our communities, our parks, but also they never biodegrade. They break down into smaller and smaller pieces and they eventually wash into our Great Lakes. There's 22 million pounds of plastic that enter the Great Lakes everyday," said Brian Smith, Citizens Campaign for the Environment Associate Director.

Many customers of the Lexington Co-op have already moved away from using plastic bags. Last year the Co-op gave out more than 2 thousand reusable canvas bags for customers to use instead.

"We support a statewide ban on plastic bags," said Tim Bartlett, Lexington Co-op General Manager.

Citizens Campagin for the Environment Associate Director Brian Smith says a plastic bag ban policy has been effective in curbing plastic pollution in hundreds of communities across the country.

"There's about 20 communities throughout New York state that have passed some sort of bag policy. But this is not just a local issue this is a statewide problem so that's why we think it makes a lot of sense for the state to make this policy official," said Smith.

Smith says Cuomo's proposal is a huge step in the right direction but he believes the ban could be further enhanced.

"Having a ban and complementing that with a 5 cent fee on paper bags has been the most effective policy in other parts of the country," said Smith.

Watch the video.

Frank P. Long film premieres

Source: The Long Island Advance

Frank P. Long film premieres

BY GLENN ROHRBACKER

Posted: January 12, 2019
Originally Published: January 10, 2019

Theresa Palermo, a retired teacher from Frank P. Long Intermediate School, gives a tour with her cell phone of each classroom where teachers have contracted cancer and, in some cases, have died. This is the opening to “Sick School,” a documentary film by Keif Roberts, which premiered at the Boys and Girls Club in Bellport on Saturday. 

To a packed house, the film showed a dark and impactful story about a community fighting for the health of students, teachers and residents. The film centers around the landfill and its effects on the environment, but also the fight to close the school after a higher-than-average cancer rate had been discovered.

Rumors were spread saying that current teachers were asked not to attend the screening, but a union official said she was “unaware” of such a request. Superintendent Joseph Giani said the rumors “are simply not true.” But the same union rep said, “[I] can understand why teachers may have been concerned about going to the screening.”

Parents interviewed in the film, next to their children, articulated how they had always come home sick or with some kind of ailment. For Skye, a former student at Frank P. Long, it was headaches that prevented her from participating in sports and other activities.

“I never had a migraine until I started at Frank P. Long,” she said in the film. 

Parents reported that their students were fine at home and when school was out, prompting them to believe something was wrong at school. Teachers also said they had been sending kids to the nurse a lot.

On the teacher side, Palermo is the only survivor of four teachers who contracted lung cancer while working at the school. She doesn’t smoke and never did, but in 2005 she was diagnosed with a tumor the size of a softball, she said, which required doctors to remove her entire lung. She was out of work for five months.

Subjects in the film, which also included Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, criticized the way testing and response was handled by officials, calling it government protecting government. They also considered it an attack on the community itself, where residents deal with the same health issues and unpleasant odors every day. 

“They’re not putting a 276-foot mountain of garbage in a rich community on the North Shore of Long Island, are they?” Esposito said in the film.

The film also took a look at conversations with the school board last year, which included a plan to close Frank P. Long and relocate. There were also discussions with then-Assemb. Dean Murray for a plan to relocate to a vacant school in Sachem. The board decided against this, citing the test results, which indicated that the indoor air was adequate for a school. In October 2018, Giani reiterated this view while preparing to unveil the school’s new courtyard.

“Our board of education was committed to ensuring this school was safe for both students and staff, so they authorized and fully funded the most comprehensive environmental investigation done at a school in New York State,” he said.

Subjects in the film pushed back on the studies done, saying that air testing was done when kids were not in school or when the wind was not blowing from the direction of the landfill. Results of testing are available on the district website.

In addition to the screening, there was a Q&A held with audience members and subjects of the film, including Palermo, Esposito and parents. A lawsuit was filed in 2018 with 25 plaintiffs against the town for both the nuisance and health issues caused by the landfill. Audience members brought up the effect the landfill has had on the community outside of the school and there were also representatives from Northport, who have been fighting with the state and the school district about toxic materials under school grounds that have been causing illness in teachers and students.

The film did not include interviews with Murray or school officials or members of the board of education, who were also not present at the screening. Roberts is looking at ways to broadcast the film at alternate locations, but it is unclear where it will be able to be viewed at this time.

Public addresses impact study concerns at first of three Belmont hearings

Source: The Island Now

Public addresses impact study concerns at first of three Belmont hearings

BY JED HENDRIXSON

Posted: January 12, 2019
Originally Published: January 9, 2019

Though the Christmas season ended weeks ago, Floral Park resident Christy Reisig still has Frank Capra’s “It’s a Wonderful Life” on her mind.

Reisig compared the village to the imaginary Bedford Falls, and concerned that the potential redevelopment of Belmont Park into an arena and retail space would turn it into a modern-day Pottersville, hand-delivered 901 letters opposing the project from residents to Empire State Development Tuesday night.

Empire State Development, a state agency, hosted the first of three public hearings at Elmont Memorial Library following the approval of the draft environmental impact study for the proposed development in December.

The hearings are an opportunity for the public to voice concerns over the redevelopment of the park into an arena home for the New York Islanders and retail space, according to attorney Ed Kramer, who moderated the hearing.

A majority of comments, opposing the project in its entirety or in part, came from Floral Park residents and officials.

“This project started out as an 18,000-seat arena, stores, a hotel and restaurants all north of Hempstead Turnpike located on the property south of the grandstand at Belmont with parking on the south lot,” Village of Floral Park Mayor Dominick Longobardi said. “Today this project has spread out to encompass retail stores on the south side of Hempstead Turnpike, where parking was supposed to go, using parking lots adjacent to schools and homes that originally were expressly said were not going to be used.”

Before opening the floor to public comment, ESD Vice President of Real Estate Development and Planning Tom Conoscenti and AKRF Engineering Vice President John Neill described the general scope of the project, timeline and potential adverse impacts of the project.

The project is generally the same as when it was announced in December 2017, according to Conoscenti.

If approved, it would include an 18,000-seat arena, 250-room hotel, 435,000 square feet of retail and 30,000 feet of office space. The development would also use 6,310 parking spaces that already exist in the north, south and east parking lots.

A significant change that did occur to the site plans over the course of the past year was the relocation of a PSEG Long Island power substation away from Floral Park-Bellerose School and closer to exit 26D on the Cross Island Parkway.

Neill addressed the potential adverse impacts the development would have on the area. The only areas shown to have impacts would be construction, in the form of noise and traffic, and transportation.

A traffic mitigation plan is continually being addressed, Neill said. Potential strategies for mitigating the adverse impacts that increased traffic would bring to the area include carpooling and ride shares, apps like Waze that instruct users to avoid traffic jams and optimizing onsite parking.

When Neill mentioned that event attendees will be encouraged to arrive earlier and stay later to mitigate peak traffic times, some members of the crowd laughed.

Transportation, traffic congestion and increased volume have been the focal points of those who oppose the development.

“I think the presentation you just made, where you’re asking thousands of people to change their driving behavior, frankly underscores just how unprepared this current plan is to absorb the thousands of cars,” state Sen. Todd Kaminsky (D-Long Beach) said. Kaminsky’s district, which encompasses Elmont, directly borders Belmont Park.

“Until we have solid answers on critical topics and critical questions in this area, this community is not going to rest and the elected officials that represent this community are not going to rest asking and demanding answers,” Kaminsky said.

“It is an absolute shame that the proposed site of the development is currently being used as a parking lot for new and used cars,” Nassau County Legislator Carrie Solages said. “We can do better than that, but does that mean that we as a community should settle for just any development?”

Solages’ district includes Elmont, South Floral Park and Belmont Park itself.

“It is important that the community is made a partner in whatever is developed there. After all it is the surrounding community that will be forced to deal with any negative impact, such as traffic, noise and the overall impact on the environment,” Solages said.

Solages, like other speakers, called for full-time service at the Long Island Rail Road’s Belmont station. ESD currently plans to have two trains running to and from Jamaica station before and after Islander games, and said it will work with the LIRR to explore opportunities to create full-time service in the future.

The creation of a full-time station would not mitigate traffic concerns, as Long Island residents would have no reason to drive to stations to use public transportation, according to some residents who spoke.

Floral Park Police Commissioner Stephen McAllister addressed concerns that the village’s 34-member Police Department would be negatively affected, and said that a claim in the impact statement that traffic accidents would not be unduly impacted by the increase in volume was “ridiculous.”

“I’ve seen you people drive,” McAllister said.

Floral Park is one of the densest villages in the county at 11,000 people per square mile, according to McAllister. Six thousand cars already travel north and southbound on Plainfield Avenue in the village every day, and the addition of 1,200 daily would bisect the village and impede the department’s response times, McAllister said.

Other residents dedicated their three minutes to addressing ESD representatives on water resources and the socioeconomic impact of the development.

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said that the impact statement’s chapter on water resources was “awfully anemic,” and asked that it be revisited.

The study didn’t analyze the water resources that would be used, according to Esposito, and the statement in the DEIS that the development would not result in significant adverse impacts to water resources is not supported by facts in the chapter, she said.

No water quantity number is identified in the chapter on water resources, Esposito said, but there is a reference in the document’s executive summary that 136,000 gallons per day would be used, not including water for irrigation purposes.

“All significant or regionally significant proposals should be able to quantify water use from our aquifer system,” Esposito said.

Representing the Belmont Park Community Coalition, Tammie Williams said that sports stadiums and arenas are often not the economic engines they are touted as, are a drain on local economies and fail to deliver on economic promises to the community.

Based on research conducted by the coalition and attorney Norman Siegel, Williams asked the development agency to readdress the impact of the introduction of sports arenas into communities across the United States.

The second and third hearings will be held again at the library on Wednesday at 4 p.m. and Thursday at 6 p.m. Written comments can be submitted to Empire State Development for review until 5 p.m. on Feb. 11.


10th Nassau water district files suit against chemical manufacturers

Source: News 12 Long Island

10th Nassau water district files suit against chemical manufacturers

Posted: January 12, 2019
Originally Published: January 9, 2019

MANHASSET - The Manhasset-Lakeville Water District is the 10th in Nassau County to file a lawsuit against chemical manufacturers for polluting drinking wells with 1,4-dioxane, which is listed as a likely carcinogen.

Environmentalists say the chemical is found in manufacturing as a solvent and in many personal care products, including detergents, soaps, shampoos, cosmetics, and even baby wipes. But they say it's not listed as an ingredient because it's a byproduct.

"When we use it in the shower or bath tub or sink, it goes down into our underground water supply," says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

Esposito says if manufacturers are going to sell products that pollute groundwater, they should also pay to have it removed.

The law firm representing the water districts says defendants Dow Chemical, Ferro Corporation and Vulcan Materials "all knew or should have known that marketing, promoting, and selling products with 1,4-dioxane would put those people at risk. But they did it for decades, without warning anyone about the threats."

The highest detection of 1,4-dioxane was measured in a well in Hicksville. The Hicksville Water District filed a lawsuit in 2017 against Philips Electronics, which manufactured lights in the area for four decades.

Currently, New York state does not have drinking water standard for 1,4-dioxane, but a standard is expected to be set sometime this year.

Watch the video.

Chemical from Brookhaven lab may have spread to residential wells

Source: Newsday

Chemical from Brookhaven lab may have spread to residential wells

Brookhaven National Laboratory's advisory council has recommended 97 properties in East Yaphank south of the Upton lab be tested for a chemical that was in firefighting foams once used at the lab.

BY DAVID M. SCHWARTZ

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

Contamination from a firefighting foam has been found at Brookhaven National Laboratory, raising concerns from an advisory group that a soon-to-be-regulated chemical has spread off-site to private residential wells.

The lab's community advisory council urged BNL to test 97 properties in East Yaphank south of the lab for per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of artificially made chemicals that includes perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). The chemical, which was in firefighting foams used at the lab from the 1960s until 2008, is expected to be regulated next year by New York State, officials said.

In a Nov. 8 letter, the council wrote that it "is concerned about members of the public utilizing private wells that live south of the Laboratory and may be adversely impacted by PFAS contamination," according to the letter from the 26-member advisory council, made up of civic board representatives, scientists and environmentalists, to lab director Doon Gibbs. "The members of the CAC [community advisory council] are hopeful that the practice of prioritizing public health, environmental and groundwater protection will continue and that BNL will test all private wells contained in the 97 additional properties."

Brookhaven National Lab officials said last week they had not decided whether to test the wells outside the lab, south of the Long Island Expressway, and was working with local, state and federal regulators. BNL is a research institution funded primarily by the U.S. Department of Energy, with almost 3,000 employees and 4,000 visiting researchers studying physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, and applied science.

Brookhaven has continued to drill wells on the 5,265-acre lab grounds in Upton to see how far the contamination has spread. The chemical has been detected at the highest levels around its current and former fire stations, and in three of five drinking water supply wells. 

"We recognize how important this issue is. We’re trying to move forward as quickly as we can, working with the regulators," Jason Remien, manager of the lab's environmental protection division, said Wednesday.

Officials from the state DEC and Department of Health said in a joint statement they were evaluating the need to test the wells "as part of their comprehensive investigation of contamination."

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services had requested private well testing for about 97 properties, in an area that stretches south from the lab to Sunrise Highway, according to a PowerPoint presentation given to the advisory council in October.

"It is the position of Suffolk County Department of Health Services that due to the detection of PFAS in groundwater on BNL property above the EPA health advisory level, the U.S. Department of Energy should pay for PFAS testing in private wells down-gradient of BNL," according to a statement from health department spokeswoman Grace Kelly-McGovern. 

Private wells are not regularly tested or treated, and are generally shallower than those drilled by public water providers, meaning health officials fear they're more susceptible to pollution. The number of private wells on Long Island is unknown, though water officials estimate up to 40,000 homes are on private wells.

The group of chemicals at issue increasingly have become a concern among regulators and environmentalists. Health effects include liver damage, decreased fertility, developmental delays in fetuses and children, and is considered a possible carcinogen, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The detection of PFOS in groundwater prompted the state to add Gabreski Air National Guard Base in Westhampton Beach and a Suffolk County fire-training center in Yaphank to the state Superfund list because of contaminated water supplies. The chemicals have shown up in private wells in nearby Wainscott, as well as in public wells in Hampton Bays.

A state panel this month recommended a drinking water standard of 10 parts per trillion for PFOS and a related chemical PFOA, used in manufacturing, which would be the most protective drinking water standards in the nation. The state health commissioner is expected to set a standard next year.

Historical photos included in the lab's presentation to the advisory group show firefighting foam spilling onto the ground during training exercises in 1966 and a demonstration of a fire suppression system in 1970.

Testing wells installed near the lab's current firehouse found levels of PFOA and PFOS up to 12,400 parts per trillion, and at 5,370 parts per trillion at the lab's former firehouse, according to a statement from lab spokesman Pete Genzer. Those two sites were believed to be the "primary locations" where firefighting foam was used during training.

The Suffolk Department of Health Services tested drinking water supply wells in 2017 as part of a national program to collect data on emerging contaminants of concern to the public. The detection at BNL previously had not been reported.

The contamination has been found at three of the five drinking water supply wells at BNL; two at levels of up to 27 parts per trillion, and one at up to 70.4 parts per trillion, though Remien said he believes there was a quality assurance problem with the highest sample, from June 2018. Other samples were below 70 parts per trillion, which is the current EPA health advisory level for PFOS.

One supply well is no longer used, and the lab is re-establishing carbon filtration on the other two wells, Genzer said in a statement. Tests of treated drinking water at the lab are less than 3 parts per trillion, he said.

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment and a member of the CAC, said BNL shouldn't delay testing the private wells.

"To be a good neighbor, they should just test the wells," she said. "It is an ethical obligation of BNL to test their neighbors' wells for contamination they may have caused."

Legis. Al Krupski (D-Copiague), whose district includes the lab, said he believes BNL is evaluating other potential sources of contamination.

"I think they have to do their due diligence, and I have confidence they will. They have addressed environmental concerns in the past," he said.

Raymond Keenan, representative for Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Organizations, said, "I don’t have a feeling they’re sitting on this, but it’s a bureaucracy. They have to go through their motions."

Mike Giacomaro, president of the East Yaphank Civic Association, said most of the homes in the area have been offered hookups to public water supplied by the Suffolk County Water Authority because of pollution passed from BNL, including tritium in the groundwater.


Town scores $80K to cut energy costs, pollution

Source: Long Island Business News

Town scores $80K to cut energy costs, pollution

BY ADINA GENN

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

The Town of Hempstead was awarded an $80,000 grant from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to develop an energy and sustainability master plan to help slash the municipality’s carbon footprint and energy costs.

According to the DEC, the plan will include updating the town’s energy, fleet, and greenhouse gas inventory data and assessing all energy and sustainability related polices. The analysis will aim to indicate where the town made progress and highlight opportunities for improvement, addition of new policies or programs, or expansion of existing programs.

Officials say that last year the town spent nearly $8 million in gas and electric. But each year, they say, those costs increase by an average of 3.2 percent even if its energy consumption stays the same.

“The development of a green innovation economy is not only beneficial to the environment, it is better for the bottom-line, saving taxpayers money,” Town of Hempstead Supervisor Laura Gillen said in a statement.

“By setting goals to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and making purchases that are more environmentally friendly, we can combat the disastrous effects of climate change,” she said.

“A comprehensive sustainability plan is important for the betterment of the environment in the Town of Hempstead,” State Sen. Todd Kaminsky said in a statement.

He said that by implementing the plan, the town would “become a leader in advancing renewable energy.”

As a proponent of protecting the environment, Kaminsky said earlier this year that “we need to be aggressive and we need to act quickly, but we need to be thoughtful.”

In July, the town became the largest local municipality in the state to take the “climate smart communities pledge,” officials said. That meant pledging to reduce community energy use and the discharge of pollutants into the environment, while increasing the use of renewable resources.

The pledge also calls for boosting local resiliency projects and other public works to prepare for the effects of climate change that can endanger the town’s infrastructure and economy and that might also pose health threats to the community.

That commitment scored high marks from advocates for the environment.

“The South Shore of Long Island is currently engaged in an historic battle to protect our communities from climate change impacts,” Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said in a statement.

The pledge “will have a positive impact locally and regionally. Reducing greenhouse gases, saving tax dollars, and fighting climate change is just good government,” she added.

Retail Roundup: Complaints snagged 12 stores not charging for single-use bags

Source: Newsday

Retail Roundup: Complaints snagged 12 stores not charging for single-use bags

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services imposes a penalty of up to $500 if a bag violation is cited upon re-inspection.

BY TORY N. PARRISH

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

Retailers say Suffolk County’s bag-fee law is working as intended, but how many are violating the law by not charging customers for bags?

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services said it has received 24 complaints about noncompliant stores since Jan. 1, 2018, when a law began requiring supermarkets, pharmacies, clothing stores and other types of retailers to charge customers 5 cents for each single-use plastic and paper bag they use to carry out their purchases.

“Twelve covered stores were found to be in violation of the law. Zero stores were in violation upon reinspection,” the department said.

The department imposes a penalty of up to $500 if a violation is cited upon re-inspection. No stores have been fined, it said.

The 24 complaints about noncompliant stores came from consumers, but the department does have inspectors out doing spot checks, the agency said.

The number of cited complaints is small considering that, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Suffolk County has 5,500 retail trade establishments, excluding furniture stores, car dealerships and non-store retailers. 

The county's bag-fee law, which raised the ire of some shoppers when it went into effect, is intended to increase the utilization of reusable bags and reduce the number of single-use plastic bags polluting waterways. Suffolk County does not receive any portion of the bag fees collected by stores.

The county’s law requires the health department to prepare an annual recycling report by March 1 on the legislation’s progress, including information on any cost savings for the county from reductions in contaminated waterways and on the benefits of waste and litter reduction.

I reported on Dec. 20 that the Food Industry Alliance of New York State said its survey of Suffolk County grocery stores that are members of the trade group showed an 80 percent decline in the distribution of single-use bags in the first and second quarters of 2018.

Twenty cities, towns and villages in New York State have enacted single-use bag fees or bans, including Long Beach and the Village of Sea Cliff in Nassau County, according to the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, an advocacy group based in Farmingdale. New York City’s fee was blocked by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2017.

New Tanger tenants

Shoes, shirts and shades. Oh, my.

Two new tenants, Cole Haan Outlet and Looks & Co. Designer Glasses, opened at Tanger Outlets Deer Park in November. Also, one of the premium-brand shopping center’s existing shops, a Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Store, relocated to a space that is about 40 percent bigger in October.

“We are excited to welcome all of the new additions,” said Nancy W. Larson, general manager for the shopping center.

Looks & Co., which sells designer prescription sunglasses and eyeglasses, opened Nov. 3 in a 2,007-square-foot space, suite 1450, that was once occupied by Kay Jewelers.

The eyewear shop offers high-end brands such as Tom Ford, Versace, Gucci and Prada, said owner Rafael Hanukashvili.

A Dix Hills resident, Hanukashvili, 42, opened his first Looks & Co. store in Syosset in September 2016, he said.

“Customer service is the most important to me. … We make sure we can take care of everything for our customers,” he said.

Cole Haan Outlet sells shoes, outerwear and accessories. 

On Nov. 14 the store opened in a 2,400-square-foot spot in Tanger suite 1599, which was previously occupied by an Easy Spirit shoe store.

“New York is a strong market for Cole Haan, and this is an addition to the fleet,” the Greenland, New Hampshire-based retailer said.

The Deer Park Polo Ralph Lauren store, an outlet tenant since 2014, relocated to suite 301, a space of 10,283 square feet near the Neiman Marcus Last Call store, and opened there on Oct. 26.

“It was relocated just to have a more prominent space and a bigger footprint,” Manhattan-based Ralph Lauren Corp. said.

Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Stores sell clothing and accessories for adults and children.
Opened in 2008, Tanger Outlets Deer Park has 739,109 square feet of leasable space and was 97 percent occupied as of Sept. 30, according to a regulatory filing by Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc.

City 'Styrofoam' ban beginning on Jan. 1

Source: Queens Chronicle

City 'Styrofoam' ban beginning on Jan. 1

Substance banned for food, beverages, packaging

BY MICHAEL GANNON, EDITOR

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 27, 2018

New York City’s long-fought battle over single-use expanded polystyrene products, best known in the vernacular as “Styrofoam,” officially will end on Jan 1 when a citywide ban goes into effect.

Under the new laws, food service establishments, stores and manufacturers no longer can sell or offer EPF products for food sales or packaging, whether it be a cup for coffee, a “clamshell” container for a takeout food or foam packing peanuts used to ship and transport fragile objects.

The law was passed this past summer after a study determined that the material could not be easily recycled.

Some small businesses had opposed the move based on potential cost increases. But the city’s Department of Small Business Services has been accepting hardship waiver applications since July from nonprofits and small businesses with less than $500,000 in annual revenue.

The applications are available online at nyc.gov/foamwaiver.

A spokeswoman for the city Department of Sanitation told the Chronicle in an email that anyone who may have received a gift or other package containing foam packaging material and who wants to get rid of it may do so by “discarding them as garbage on their regular collection days.”

Employees at two delis visited by the Chronicle this week declined to comment or have their photographs taken.

Sandwiches sold in both places were wrapped in white paper, foil or both. Other foods were packaged in aluminum containers with lids of either clear plastic or cardboard.

Coffee and tea at each deli and a pair of Dunkin’ Donuts shops were served in paper cups, though the lids were plastic.

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, on Wednesday called the coming implementation a victory for both the environment and public health.

“New York City residents will be healthier, because people microwave food in those containers, drink from those containers which allow toxins to leech into their food,” Esposito said.

She said it was her organization’s hope that the New York City ban will attract the attention of Gov. Cuomo, the leadership of the state Assembly and the new Democratic leadership of the state Senate when the 2019 session convenes in Albany next week.

“New York City has sent a loud message across the bow of the New York State Legislature,” Esposito said.

Feds Hear Concerns Over Deepwater Wind Proposal

Feds Hear Concerns Over Deepwater Wind Proposal

BY JD ALLEN

Posted: November 7, 2018
Originally Published: November 6, 2018

Remarks by Brad Loewen, the chairman of the East Hampton Town Fisheries Advisory Committee, were met with cheers from most East End residents who packed American Legion Post 419 in Amagansett on Monday. 

At a public hearing, Mr. Loewen, a former town councilman, accosted U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management officials, saying that his voice as a resident and bayman felt “stifled,” as the federal government begins to draft an environmental impact statement for Deepwater Wind’s proposal to construct 15 wind-generated power turbines in the ocean off Block Island. 

“At worst, you don’t give a damn what we have to say, because you have already made up your minds,” he said. 

More than 100 residents came to the meeting to hear a presentation by BOEM officials and to comment on the federal review of the offshore wind energy project. 

Residents were given two minutes each to offer input on issues and concerns about the project, and were encouraged to submit written comments, or to comment online at regulations.gov, by November 19. More than 15 stations were set up around the room staffed with Virginia-based BOEM experts and Deepwater Wind community liaisons to answer questions about the project. 

Bayman like Mr. Loewen say the construction, operation and eventual decommission of Deepwater Wind’s renewable energy project would disrupt their business, and they fear the pile driving and dredging of the seabed to make way for underwater cables and turbine foundations would drive wildlife away from popular commercial fishing locations.

Mr. Loewen called for the federal government to compel Deepwater Wind to compensate commercial fishermen for lost revenue due to construction. He also called for fisheries, which he said bear “the weight of this proposal,” to have a seat at the table during all phases of the project. 

“We know this is our last, best hope,” Mr. Loewen said. 

BOEM Environmental Impact Statement Coordinator Mary Boatman said the agency is weighing whether to approve Deepwater Wind’s proposal, with or without modifications, to put a wind farm in the leasing area in federal waters—which requires public input to shape the project. 

In addition to asking the public for input, BOEM consults with other governing agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and regulations, such as the National Historic Preservation Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act, before it can let the applicant proceed.

“If we want to build a wind farm, we ask ourselves, ‘How are we going to do it with the fisheries in mind?’” said Aileen Kenney, the energy company’s senior vice president of development. 

Deepwater Wind touted throughout the night its community outreach on the docks with local fisheries. Fishing surveys for the project were even claimed to be done on commercial fishing vessels with fishermen. 

“In order to be successful in development, you have to make concessions,” she continued.

Deepwater Wind contends it has already changed its plans after discussions with East Hampton Town officials to get permission to bring the power cable to shore at Beach Lane in Wainscott to connect to the PSEG Long Island electric substation. The company has promised to increase the spacing between wind turbines to one mile, arrange the wind farm in a grid to not interfere with commercial passageways, and scrapped a northern cable route. 

Ms. Kenney also said that Ørsted, the Danish wind energy giant that purchased Deepwater Wind for $510 million in October, is committed to backing all of those promises made. 

Town officials, however, made it clear more still needs to be done.

Town Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc, Councilman David Lys, Trustee Clerk Francis Bock and Trustee Rick Drew asked for the federal government to complete additional baseline studies on fish and wildlife habitats before it compiles its draft environmental impact statement. They also asked them to consider approving smaller cables with better insulation and fewer turbines installed farther apart, among other changes.

“This project will set an example for larger wind developments in that lease area off the coast,” Mr. Van Scoyoc said. “It is critically important that BOEM vet all of the environmental concerns, and the economic impacts on the fishing industry that supplies the traditional means of making a living here in town for the last 400 years.” 

Michael McDonald, a Springs resident and member of the East End Resilience Network, claimed the 15-turbine project was going to open the door to the long-term industrialization of the Atlantic Ocean.

“If our town has to absorb this kind of industrialization, it will change the character of the town,” he said. 

Other residents, like Michael Wootton of Wainscott, were concerned the project was far more extensive than what they were privy to. The fear is that what BOEM is considering has doubled in size since it was first proposed, laying the groundwork for a larger plan. The plan submitted to BOEM suggests the project has grown to a 180-megawatt wind farm with two 230-kilovolt transmission cables coming to shore or to potentially an offshore substation. 

The area leased by Deepwater can accommodate more than 100 wind turbines, which is set by the energy company and not by federal limitations. Also, there are more federal waters designated for wind energy projects close by, and other projects in the works. In addition there is another, separate proposal BOEM is considering to open up about 287 square miles of the Atlantic Ocean south of Fire Island for wind farm development.

Mr. Wootton said that, to make matters worse, BOEM has never stopped a project from happening or approved a project of this scale—even though there is another Deepwater Wind project off the coast of Block Island. “Block Island is not a barrier beach,” Mr. Wootton said. “You’ve never done this before.”

Ms. Boatman contends that even though there are multiple irons in the fire, if the project was to be approved, Deepwater Wind would be allowed to build only within regulations. “The only thing we are looking at, and what can be built if approved, is for 15 turbines,” Ms. Boatman said.

“But we are looking at a broader future here, too—cumulative, outside this project,” said Michelle Morin, the regional environmental branch chief at BOEM. 

Meanwhile, some residents, like Don Matheson of East Hampton, wholeheartedly supported the proposal, saying that the larger benefit to combat climate change is more important, and “the ship has sailed” when it comes to over-industrialization of the South Fork. 

“It’s this or it’s going to be something else to keep up for the increased demand for electricity and combat climate change,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, which is based in Farmingdale. “Or we make an effort to stop development—but you can ask the supervisor how that’s going.”

As the meeting came to a close, Steve Williams, the president of the Azurest Homeowners Association in Sag Harbor, asked, when all said and done, what electricity is going to cost the average resident.

Jennifer Garvey, the Long Island development manager at Deepwater Wind, said that LIPA figures put the rate at 16 cents per kilowatt—even if there are delays to construction or setbacks. That’s lower than what the New York State comptroller’s office has said the cost of the LIPA contract for power from the wind farm will be, saying the cost to ratepayers is an average of about 22.5 cents per kilowatt over the 20-year life of the project. 

“The risk is ours to bear,” Ms. Garvey said.

“Just remember us, please,” Mr. Williams said. “We are part of the environment, too.”

Recycling is piling up at LI facilities, as China puts limits on buying

Recycling is piling up at LI facilities, as China puts limits on buying

Declining prices caused by restrictions imposed this year by China could lead to changes in the way many Long Islanders dispose of paper and other material.

BY DAVID M. SCHWARTZ AND CARL MACGOWAN

Posted: October 30, 2018
Originally Published: October 29, 2018

Thousands more tons of Long Island recyclables are ending up as trash compared to prior years because of plummeting prices caused by restrictions imposed this year by China, the world's largest importer of recycled cardboard and plastics, recycling operators said.

The restrictions have upended Long Island's already struggling recycling efforts, and could lead to changes in the way many Long Islanders dispose of paper and other material — particularly in towns that switched to once-heralded "single stream" recycling programs that allowed residents to combine paper, plastic, aluminum and glass in one container, officials said.

In some cases, towns that have made money in past years from selling recycled cardboard and paper have now had to pay to get rid of it because China will no longer buy it. China is seeking to stimulate its domestic recycling market and be more environmentally responsible.

The problem reached a flash point last week when Green Stream Recycling told Brookhaven officials it could no longer run the town's recycling facility. Green Stream is expected to fold, and Brookhaven on Thursday expects to name a new operator to temporarily run the recycling system while town officials weigh their long-term options. Brookhaven plans to continue the single stream program.

Haulers such as West Babylon-based Winters Bros. Waste Systems, a Green Stream co-owner and one of the Island's largest single-stream recyclers, say the declining recyclables market makes it nearly impossible for them to make a living. 

“I’ve never seen it this bad, and I’ve been in this business for 35 years,” said Will Flower, vice president of Winters Bros. “In some cases, the material no longer has a home. It’s no longer recyclable.”

Though fluctuating commodities prices are considered normal in the waste industry, Brookhaven and Green Stream previously had touted the town's single-stream program since it began in 2014.

In its first year using single stream, the town saw a 25 percent increase in the number of homes that recycled. Similar increases were reported by towns such as Smithtown, Huntington and Southold that agreed to transfer their recyclables to the Brookhaven plant.

But this year, nearly 22 percent of recyclable paper, plastic, cardboard and aluminum brought to the Brookhaven facility has gone to incinerators or landfills, double the rates of 2016 and 2017, according to figures provided by Green Stream. The Brookhaven plant also processes collections from single-stream programs in several villages and school districts.

The additional material thrown away is on pace to be more than 7,000 tons by the end of the year — and doesn’t include glass, which hasn't been recycled from curbside bins for years. Instead, glass is crushed up and used as cover and drainage at Brookhaven's landfill, town and company officials said.

The increased rate is one result of a recycling market roiled across the country since Jan. 1, when China implemented policies — known as "National Sword" — aimed at boosting the country's environment and stimulating its domestic recyclables market. Those policies banned the import of some recyclable materials and required higher quality for other items like cardboard, national and local experts say.

Among the recent effects from the changing market:

Recyclables spilled out of the Brookhaven facility this summer as space ran out inside and no one would buy the material. Eventually, the newspaper and cardboard left out in the rain was composted in Brookhaven with the permission of the state Department of Environmental Conservation.
Green Stream, saying it could not afford to operate the Brookhaven plant, pulled out of its deal with the town. Brookhaven officials have said Green Stream owes the town $1.7 million in unpaid fees and bills, which Flower said the company likely will not pay.

  • Huntington said Brookhaven officials announced they will discontinue an agreement to take Huntington's recyclables at the end of this year. Huntington had been making $8 per ton from shipping paper, plastics and other material to Brookhaven, but capacity shortages at the Brookhaven facility have forced Huntington to pay $10 per ton to take material to a private waste facility, Huntington Director of Environmental Waste Management John Clark said in an email.

  • Smithtown and Huntington are seeking new recycling vendors. Those towns and Southold and Oyster Bay towns all have said they are reconsidering their single-stream recycling programs.

  • Recommendations including doubling the bottle and can fee to 10 cents, adding a fee on liquor and wine bottles and removing glass from curbside collections, along with an aggressive public education campaign about how to recycle better, are among proposals from a Long Island recycling advisory committee to the state DEC in October.


China is by far the world's largest consumer of U.S. recyclables, dating to the early 1990s, when the nation's voracious appetite for cardboard and plastic coincided with efforts by American cities and towns to ramp up nascent recycling programs. Both countries benefited from a system in which discarded cardboard was shipped to China, then came back to the United States as recycled boxes containing consumer goods before going back to China to be recycled once again.

Before this year, China consumed as much as 40 percent of the United States’ exported recyclables — more than the next 10 foreign nations combined, said Adina Renee Adler, senior director for government relations and international affairs at the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, a Washington, D.C., trade group.

“Because China gave us very little time to transition, it gives the recyclers very little time to find other markets,” Adler said.

Total value of waste and scrap exports to China by month

Scrap exports to China have declined since the ban on several types of plastics and mixed paper took effect Jan. 1 and all but halted in May when China temporarily suspended pre-shipment inspections.

China is trying to stamp out "contamination" — the waste industry term for recyclables that contain residue such as moisture and glue from packing tape and labels. Locally, inspectors hired by a Chinese firm now prod bales of paper with moisture detectors and examine piles of cardboard for contaminants such as glass shards before they are loaded into containers destined for overseas markets, local operators said.

Costs have climbed as companies and municipalities have slowed down conveyor belts and added additional staff to better sort streams of recyclables. Islip Town, which runs its own dual-stream recycling facility, last month approved $100,000 in unbudgeted overtime for recycling sorting.

At the same time, prices for recycled material have plummeted. Baled cardboard that could once be sold for $180 a ton is now down to nearly $60 a ton, Flower said.

Winters Bros. says it will have to alter or change some contracts under language usually reserved for natural disasters.

The Town of Oyster Bay has already agreed not to extend their single stream contract with Winters Bros. past Dec. 31, citing litigation fears, and will rebid their recycling contract in the coming weeks. 

"Anyone in the recycling business would describe this as a crisis," Flower said.

Not everyone agrees, pointing to the recycling industry's cyclical nature, including frequent price fluctuations.

"I would not characterize it as a crisis. I’d characterize it as challenging times due to changing trends and changing markets," said Martin Brand, deputy commissioner for the state DEC's office of remediation and materials management.

He said he was unaware of additional recyclable material heading to landfills or incinerators, and said no permission has been granted for recyclers to landfill or incinerate recyclables. Some municipalities had requested permission to landfill or incinerate recyclables at a statewide meeting on the recycling changes this summer, but DEC did not give them permission, he said.

The changes in the recycling stream have ignited a debate over the benefits of single-stream recycling and dual-stream, where residents put out paper products one week and then the rest of the recyclables the next week.

Single-stream recycling increases participation in municipal recycling programs, but mixing paper products with cans and bottles leaves cardboard spoiled by rainwater and carbonated soda, or torn by broken glass.

“You can’t unscramble an egg,” Susan Collins, president of the Container Recycling Institute of Culver City, California, said in an interview. “Putting all these items in the same cart leads to contamination.”

Some residents also deposit non-recyclables — everything from food and soccer balls to garden hoses — into recycling containers, a phenomenon that waste officials call "wish-cycling."

Some local operators said that single stream, by creating a contaminated stream, has forced China's crackdown on recycling.

As single-stream recycling grew, not just on Long Island but nationally, the product coming out of the United States became more contaminated, said Patricia DiMatteo, owner of Omni Recycling of Babylon, a dual-stream facility. People became less discerning about what they threw into their recycling bins, she said. While Omni Recycling has had to more carefully sort its recycling stream, the amount that it sends to landfills — yard waste, hoses, cheese-stained pizza boxes — has remained about the same, she said.

"In my opinion, it was the advent of single-stream recycling that destroyed the market," DiMatteo said.

When Brookhaven announced its single-stream program in 2014, town officials envisioned the plant becoming a regional processing center that would serve municipalities across Long Island. Green Stream had poured $7 million to upgrade the facility in Brookhaven hamlet.

In 2015, the plant expanded after the DEC imposed a $25,000 fine for violations including the disposing of recyclables as waste.

With Green Stream leaving the facility, Brookhaven officials have said the program's new operator will have the option of continuing with single stream — or switching to a dual-stream system.

Before the recycling game changed

Here are the number of tons of recycled and unrecycled waste reported by each Long Island town in 2016*, the latest year available.

* Islip failed to file a 2016 report, so we used its 2017 report; all other town and city data are from 2016, the most recent year available from all other municipalities.

Towns such as Islip and Southampton that stuck with dual-stream recycling said their operations have fared better than single-stream programs. The amount of material that ends up as garbage has not increased because separated recyclables are less contaminated and therefore more attractive to buyers, they said.
Jim Heil, Islip's former waste commissioner, said the town's decision not to convert to single stream a few years ago is paying off.

"We looked at it when it was all the rage. We stayed the course, decided to do what we were continuing to do," Heil, who co-chairs the recycling committee with Flower, said. "It's to our benefit now, with the blip in the market."

Robert Lange, executive director of North Hempstead's Solid Waste Management Authority, who ran New York City's recycling program for 20 years as the director before that, said residents have to be better educated on what to recycle, and be encouraged to recycle more.

But he warned that some of the concerns are overblown and he has seen contractors in the past try to use bad market conditions to renegotiate contracts.

"I think there’s hype right now and whenever there’s any kind of drama like that, someone’s going to use it as an opportunity to readjust things in their favor," he said.

Some of recycling's issues existed long before China’s new policy, even if they were rarely talked about outside industry circles. 

In some cases, materials can't be sold at all. Certain kinds of thin plastic food containers, for example, are incinerated or landfilled, Flower said.

Glass, when crushed and colors are mixed, has rarely been sold on recycling markets. The industry has also struggled with plastic bags and hoses getting caught in recycling machinery.

“A good market hid a lot of sins,” Flower said.

Peter Scully, former regional DEC director and former vice-chair of the New York State Solid Waste Management Board, said the towns should not have rushed into single-stream recycling.

"A better approach might have been to undertake single stream on a pilot basis to make sure it was sustainable over the long-term, and didn’t generate excess amounts of reject material, as a result of cross-contamination of paper products with broken glass," he said.

Some environmentalists agreed that big changes to recycling are needed, including more education for residents on what to recycle and state incentives or investments to encourage local recycling markets.

“Recycling was never free, now we're faced with what the actual costs are going to be,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

"We were misled years ago that single stream would be helpful for recycling. In fact, it’s been extremely harmful," she said. "It contaminates some material. And hasn’t brought any benefit and has only brought contamination of the material. It’s a disaster."

R. Lawrence Swanson, associate dean for Stony Brook University’s School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, said contract squabbles between recyclers and municipalities, such as the one between Oyster Bay and Winters Bros., could become more common.

“Probably some of those agreements are going to be in disarray and there’s going to be a need or an attempt to renegotiate,” Swanson said.

Environmentalists: New power plant would be detrimental to LI

Environmentalists: New power plant would be detrimental to LI

Posted: October 29, 2018
Originally Published: October 25, 2018

FARMINGVILLE -

Environmentalists say a new power plant coming to Yaphank would be detrimental to Long Island.

“The last thing Long Island needs is a power plant that will shackle us to fossil fuels for the next 50 years,” says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

The power plant, dubbed Caithness II, got the green light in 2014 when the Brookhaven Town Board voted 5-2 in favor of it. Back then, Caithness Long Island proposed a facility with two smokestacks. Plans for the project have since been downsized to 600 watts with one smokestack.

Plant opponents made their voices heard during the public comment portion of Thursday night’s Brookhaven Town Board meeting. But not everyone was opposed to the plant. One truck drove around Town Hall with a message in support of the plant.

News 12 reached out to Caithness about the plant. It called Caithness II a modern clean-burning, gas-fired plant that “will also support the increased use of renewable resources, like solar and wind, during times when those resources are not available.”

But environmentalists say they still have their concerns.

Town Supervisor Ed Romaine made it clear at the meeting that the town board will take no further action on Caithness II.

News 12 is told that Caithness is working through the permit process to finish the plant.

Watch the video.

Hempstead to Replace Lead Pipes

Hempstead to replace lead pipes

Project aims to prevent water-supply contamination

BY BRIDGET DOWNES

Posted: October 25, 2018
Originally Published: October 25, 2018

Town of Hempstead officials announced last week that the town would replace 100-year-old lead water pipes that service Point Lookout residents because they pose a potential health risk.

More than 500 pipes are to be replaced with copper ones, Town Supervisor Laura Gillen said at a news conference in Point Lookout on Oct. 18. The town received a $600,000 grant from the state Department of Health to switch out the pipes for more than 1,200 Point Lookout residents.

“This is aging infrastructure that is all over America and all over New York state,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment. “Lead is known to actually build up in the body and cause very serious ailments, particularly for children and developing fetuses. It causes such things as learning disabilities, anemia. It damages blood cells. It also damages the kidney, the liver and the neurological system.”

John Reinhardt, the town water commissioner, said that trace amounts of lead could be found in samples that were drawn in Point Lookout, but they were below the federal standard for safe drinking water. Gillen said there is “no reason for alarm” because the pipes had not leached lead into the water supply.

The corrosion of lead pipes can cause toxins to leach into the water, as was the case in 2014, when the water supply for more than 100,000 residents of Flint, Mich., was contaminated, Gillen recalled.

“The federal regulation for lead is 15 parts per billion, but the [Environmental Protection Agency] recommends actually a zero tolerance for lead because it’s so highly poisonous,” Esposito said. “I think that’s why being proactive and changing these pipes out before they begin to leach is so critical. Even the existing standard is really not safe enough.”

The town regularly tests its water to ensure that it is free of contaminants, including lead, Gillen said. The pipes that are now being used — one- to two-foot-long tubes called “goosenecks” — connect the water main to the service line. The lead goosenecks were standard issue in the 1920s, Gillen explained, when Point Lookout was transitioning from a seasonal beach bungalow community to a year-round residential one.

The current industry standard is copper pipes, Gillen added, noting that the town will begin to replace the pipes next month. Town employees worked with Reinhardt for months to survey the community, inspect underground infrastructure and identify where the lead pipes were located, officials said.

“The best thing a homeowner can do is when they use their water first thing in the morning, let the water run for a minute or so just to flush their own system in their house,” Reinhardt said.

Town officials said the pipes are in relatively good condition but are reaching the end of their lifespan. “This is a proactive project that is seeking to address potential health risks before they become an issue, not afterwards,” Gillen said.

Point Lookout Civic Association President Matt Brennan said there would be minimal disruptions for residents, and that he would work to keep people informed throughout the process.

“It’s better to prevent the contamination from getting in the water rather than filter it out afterwards,” Esposito said. “It’s $600,000 of prevention, which is worth millions of dollars of cleaning this up or dealing with people’s health concerns.”

Proposed Sea Gates in NYC to Guard Against Storm Surge Draws Concern from LI

Proposed sea gates in NYC to guard against storm surge draws concern from LI

The plans explore the feasibility of placing massive gates in the waters and sea walls on the shores to stem the tide during major weather events.

Posted: October 24, 2018
Originally Published: October 23, 2018

Long Island-based environmentalists urged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to rethink several design plans to construct massive gates in the waters near New York City that might protect the city from a hurricane-induced storm surge but flow back onto coastal areas of Nassau and Suffolk, flooding those areas.

“We need the Army Corps to come up with a protection plan that not only protects New York City but also protects Long Island,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, who bemoaned the fact that Long Island was not considered in the proposals. “We love New York City but we don’t want to be sacrificed to protect it.”

Esposito spoke during a news conference with other activists before the Corps’ public hearing on the tidal gates at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point.

“Climate change and sea level rise is real and we have to figure out how we’re going to address it,” said Rep. Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove), who urged the Army Corps to conduct a public hearing on Long Island before proceeding with what could be a $20 billion project.

As many as 75 people listened to the Army Corps outline five plans — one of which includes doing nothing — to guard against the effects of rising sea levels and events like superstorm Sandy. The plans explore the feasibility of placing massive gates in the waters and sea walls on the shores to stem the tide during major weather events.

Gates have been installed in a number of places around the world including Denmark, New Orleans, London and Holland, but area activists said conditions in those areas are unlike those in the New York area, where the gates would fend off an ocean’s wrath only to disperse the waters onto nearby tracts of land.

Bryce Wisemiller, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, walked the group of activists, elected officials and concerned citizens through the plans aided by renderings. He commented on their details. He stressed that the Corps is still in the preliminary stages of any project and that construction likely would not begin until 2030 or so.

Afterward, the audience posed dozens of questions, including “Do the gates move?”

The gates do move, he said. “That’s why we call them gates,” he said.

A draft study of the findings so far is scheduled to be released in January, Wisemiller said.

Environmentalists Wary of Plan to Build Storm Gates Around NYC, LI

Environmentalists wary of plan to build storm gates around NYC, LI

Posted: October 24, 2018
Originally Published: October 23, 2018

KINGS POINT - Environmentalists are urging the Army Corps of Engineers to reject a plan meant to protect New York from a major hurricane.

The Army Corps of Engineers is studying six options to protect New York and New Jersey's harbors and tributaries.

One option is to build giant storm gates and storm surge barriers around New York and Long Island.

Environmentalists fear the man-made barriers could deflect storm surges toward Long Island and increase coastal flooding.

"This to me is our modern day 'Watergate,' says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment. "They want to put up these water gates to protect the city but Long Island could indeed suffer severely for it."

Evironmentalists also are concerned that sea barriers would slowly cut off nutrients from New York Harbor and prevent contaminants from washing into the ocean.

At a public meeting Tuesday in Kings Point, the Army Corps tried to reassure Long Island residents.

"If there are indications that there will be those types of impacts, those alternatives will only go forward if we fully address those induced flooding impacts," says Bryce Wisemuller, of the Army Corps of Engineers.

A final plan is not expected to be released until 2021.

Watch the video.