CCE in the News

Lawmakers discuss proposal for statewide plastic bag ban

SOURCE:

https://www.informnny.com/news/state-news/lawmakers-discuss-proposal-for-statewide-plastic-bag-ban/1875209639

Lawmakers discuss proposal for statewide plastic bag ban

Proposal also includes a five-cent fee for use of individual paper bags

By:   Mariann Cabness 

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) - A little over a week before the state budget deadline, Democratic Assemblyman Sean Ryan discussed a statewide proposal which would ban plastic bags and place a fee on paper bags in retail stores on March 23, 2019. 

“This ban will help us to protect our environment, and encourage consumers to bring reusable bags with them, which will drastically reduce the amount litter in our environment," said Ryan. 

Ryan, joined by Erie County Executive Mark Poloncarz and Brian Smith, Executive Director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, gave details about the proposal at Delaware Park. 

The proposal is currently being considered for inclusion in the upcoming New York State Budget, according to Ryan. 

In addition to the plastic bag ban, the budget proposal calls for a five-cent fee to be charged for the use of individual paper bags. 

Ryan said the five-cent fee charged for paper bags will go to the environmental protection fund. 

The environmental protection fund would allot funds to go towards education for decreasing plastic pollution, distributing reusable bags to low or fixed-income communities, and cleanup of roads, shorelines, and waterways. 

"We all must work together to decrease plastic pollution and at the same time increase the distribution of reusable shopping bags," said Poloncarz.

The deadline for the 2019-2020 New York State Budget is April 1, 2019. 

$1M for tick-borne illness research back in state budget

SOURCE:

http://www.adirondackdailyenterprise.com/news/local-news/2019/03/1m-for-tick-borne-illness-research-back-in-state-budget/·   

An engorged blacklegged tick, otherwise known as a deer tick (Provided photo — Andre Karwath via Wikimedia Commons)

The New York state Senate reinstated $1 million in funding for Lyme and tick-borne illness research in its draft budget for 2019-20.

While that funding is still not guaranteed, the line item had been zero earlier this year.

Researchers such as Lee Ann Sporn at Paul Smith’s College and Holly Ahern at SUNY Adirondack have been advocating for the funding to be put back in the budget.

The $1 million last year helped fund Sporn’s unprecedented study of harvested deer blood in the Adirondacks. The study found that a potentially lethal virus called Powassan is more widespread than previously thought.

Others, including the Adirondack Mountain Club, have called on state leaders to secure the funding. In an op-ed, Executive Director Neil Woodworth said research supported by the state funding has “resulted in new ways for people to protect themselves through clothing and lawn treatments, and through tick bio-controls.”

With ticks found at higher elevations and in more northern areas of the country, the diseases and illnesses they carry are traveling with them.

The executive budget deadline is April 1.

To learn more about what ticks are carrying in your county, check out the state Department of Health’s tick collection data by searching for “ticks” on health.data.ny.gov.

Water infrastructure funding also in flux

Environmental organizations are also calling on state leaders to invest more funding in the Clean Water Infrastructure Act.

The state Senate budget proposal includes $2.5 billion, and groups like the New York Public Interest Research Group, Natural Resources Defense Council and Riverkeeper are looking for the Assembly and Gov. Andrew Cuomo to approve that.

Studies show that over the next two decades, $38 billion will be needed to update drinking water infrastructure across the state and $36 billion will be needed to upgrade wastewater infrastructure.

“The Clean Water Infrastructure Act has funded critical projects in every region of the state, helping to address emerging contaminants in drinking water, fight harmful algal blooms, reduce sewage overflows that foul our waters, and more,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director for Citizens Campaign for the Environment, in a release. “Despite the program’s success, water infrastructure needs continue to vastly exceed available resources.”

Ryan, Poloncarz urge plastic bag ban as budget deadline looms

SOURCE:

https://buffalonews.com/2019/03/23/ryan-poloncarz-urge-plastic-bag-ban-as-budget-deadline-looms/

By Robert J. McCarthy|Published March 23, 2019|Updated March 23, 2019

A pair of top Democrats urging a ban on plastic bags by New York retailers could not have gained a better “prop” for their Saturday morning press conference.

County Executive Mark C. Poloncarz and Assemblyman Sean M. Ryan only had to point to Delaware Park’s Rose Garden and a plastic grocery bag caught in the rosebushes. That bag and more than 20 billion others used throughout the state each year, Ryan and Poloncarz said, are causing serious problems and the new budget waiting approval in Albany should mandate the end of their regular use.

County Exec Poloncarz retrieves plastic bag in Delaware Park Saturday while calling for their ban in new state budget .

With an April 1 deadline for budget adoption looming, the pair called on the Legislature to follow through on Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s proposal to ban plastic bags that never fully decompose after an average use of about 12 minutes. They also want Albany to enact a 5 cent charge on use of paper bags that require more water and energy to manufacture than plastic bags and use more than 14 million trees each year to make.

“We can’t fix the world’s use of plastic bags, but we can start with the 20 billion that we are currently using in New York State,” Ryan said, pointing to major reductions in their use following bans in cities like San Jose and Washington.

“Such measures work,” he said.

A ban would apply to all stores, all retail and all restaurants, the assemblyman said, adding that his proposal would funnel the 5 cent paper bag fee into the state’s environmental fund.

“We need to focus on making reusable bags part of our daily life,” he said.

“A couple of years go by and you don’t think of it,” he added, pointing to the gradual and now almost universally acceptance of seat belts after initial opposition to their mandated use.

Poloncarz joined the Saturday effort by pointing to the practical benefits of a plastic bag ban. Erie County crews are constantly unclogging sewer drains and lines, he said, requiring continuous attention and unnecessary work.

“It is a big issue because it is not something that is easily remedied,” the county executive said. “Unfortunately, the bag that we use from whatever store we use … will be here a lot longer than each and every one of us.”

Poloncarz said while county efforts to ban plastic proved unsuccessful, a statewide law will prove far more effective.

“This is not something Erie County can do alone,” he said. “That’s why it’s very important this be handled on a statewide level.”

Brian Smith, associate executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, appeared with Ryan and Poloncarz to add his group’s endorsement. He said the “scourge of plastic bags” has contributed to Great Lakes pollution — about 5.5 million pounds in Lake Erie alone each year. They also cause between $300,000 and $1 million in damage to recycling facilities across the state each year, he said.

“As a society, we can no longer afford the single use plastic bag and it is time to ban them,” he said.

Ryan’s proposal to couple the plastic ban with a fee on paper bags appears to mirror one recently advanced by the State Senate in its budget negotiations. He said most of the discussion now centers around the nickel charge on paper bags, noting the Assembly remains wedded to direct deposit in an environmental fund, while retail lobbyists are also seeking some type of compensation.

Senate Democrats said earlier this month they will go along with Cuomo’s plan for a plastic ban, but are insisting on the paper bags fee to better encourage use of reusable bags. Ryan said retailers are opposed to the idea, but noted any problems they face will amount to a “short hiccup.”

The grocery industry has pushed back against the idea in recent years, with Wegmans telling The Buffalo News in 2018 that education and recycling also proves effective. Wegmans also noted that plastic bags are made of recycled plastic and natural gas, are lighter than reusable and paper bags and take up less space, requiring fewer trucks and fuel to transport.

Wegmans’ plastic bags are made from 40 percent recycled plastic, and its plastic bag recycling rate averaged nearly 50 percent in 2017, the company said.

  Lawmakers discuss proposal for statewide plastic bag ban

SOURCE:

https://www.wivb.com/news/local-news/lawmakers-discuss-proposal-for-statewide-plastic-bag-ban1/1871969450

Proposal also includes a five-cent fee for use of individual paper bags

By:   Franz Ross 

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) - A little over a week before the state budget deadline, Democratic Assemblyman Sean Ryan discussed a statewide proposal which would ban plastic bags and place a fee on paper bags in retail stores on March 23, 2019. “This ban will help us to protect our environment, and encourage consumers to bring reusable bags with them, which will drastically reduce the amount litter in our environment," said Ryan. Ryan, joined by Erie County Executive Mark Poloncarz and Brian Smith, Executive Director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, gave details about the proposal at Delaware Park. 

Plastic Bag

The proposal is currently being considered for inclusion in the upcoming New York State Budget, according to Ryan. 

In addition to the plastic bag ban, the budget proposal calls for a five-cent fee to be charged for the use of individual paper bags. 

Ryan said the five-cent fee charged for paper bags will go to the environmental protection fund. 

The environmental protection fund would allot funds to go towards education for decreasing plastic pollution, distributing reusable bags to low or fixed-income communities, and cleanup of roads, shorelines, and waterways. 

"We all must work together to decrease plastic pollution and at the same time increase the distribution of reusable shopping bags," said Poloncarz.

The deadline for the 2019-2020 New York State Budget is April 1, 2019. 

Trio of Leaders and Activists Announce Plan to Ban Plastic Bags in 2019-2020 New York State Budget

SOURCE:

https://www.buffalorising.com/2019/03/trio-of-leaders-and-activists-announce-plan-to-ban-plastic-bags-in-2019-2020-new-york-state-budget/

by queenseyes March 23, 2019, 5:29 pm 20 Comments

A number of public officials and eco advocates came together earlier today to announce a proposal to ban plastic bags in the 2019-2020 New York State budget. Finally, local leaders are stepping up to take action on this issue. Assemblyman Sean Ryan was joined today by County Executive Mark Poloncarz, and Associate Executive Director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment Brian Smith, who collectively stated that the goal is to place a ban retail stores from carrying plastic bags. The action serves to combat the scourge of single-use plastic bags that are laying waste to the environment, by ending up in our landfills and waterways. Most of these bags, and other single use plastic products, never fully break down, according to the trio of leaders and activists. 

A proposal in the 2019-2020 New York State budget will call for a ban on carryout plastic bags from retail stores. 

In a statement released hours ago, the champions of the eco action pointed out that “anywhere between 500 billion and a trillion plastic bags are used worldwide every year, and each of those bags is used for an average of 12 minutes.”

As an added incentive for shoppers to bring their own reusable bags when they shop, the leaders and activists are also calling for a five-cent fee to be charged for the use of individual paper bags. They noted that the manufacturing process and the shipping of the paper bags also pose a risk to the environment, from the energy and water used to make the bags, to the 14 million trees cut down every year. The five-cent fee would be allocated to the Environmental Protection Fund. The funds would be used for:

  • Education for decreasing plastic pollution

  • Distributing reusable bags to low or fixed-income communities

  • Cleanup of roads, shorelines, and waterways

“Our waterways, beaches and roadsides have been polluted by decades for single use plastic bags,” said Assemblyman Sean Ryan. “This ban will help us to protect our environment, and encourage consumers to bring reusable bags with them, which will drastically reduce the amount litter in our environment.  I’m committed to helping this proposal be included in the upcoming budget, and I look forward to New York State taking another step in our efforts to preserve our environment for generations to come.

Erie County Executive Mark Poloncarz said: ”I fully support a ban of single-use plastic bags and I know many residents of Erie County feel the same way. Having previously called for a ban at the county level, I understand the importance of this issue. Banning carryout plastic bags from retail stores and earmarking a five-cent fee on the use of each paper bag for the environmental protection fund is an excellent strategy. We all must work together to decrease plastic pollution and at the same time increase the distribution of reusable shopping bags. As consumers we each have a role to play to protect our environment and this is a logical step to take. I applaud Assemblyman Ryan for his leadership on this very important issue.”

“Single-use plastic bags are costly, environmentally harmful, and completely unnecessary.  Banning plastic bags will result in cleaner communities and healthier Great Lakes,” said Brian Smith, Associate Executive Director for Citizens Campaign for the Environment. “We commend Assemblyman Ryan for pursuing a smart policy that includes a fee on paper bags, which will encourage the public to switch to the environmentally-friendly and cost effective alternative—reusable bags.”

A year later: Suffolk used 1.1 billion fewer plastic bags

SOURCE:
https://libn.com/2019/03/22/a-year-later-suffolk-used-1-1-billion-fewer-plastic-bags/

By: Adina Genn March 22, 2019

The Suffolk County carryout bag law that aimed to reduce single-use bags has changed shopping habits and reduced the use of plastic, officials said.

The county used 1.1 billion fewer bags since the carryout bag law was passed last year, according to a report.

“Plastic pollution is a global issue that we are confronting locally with successful results,” Legis. William Spencer said in a statement about the study.

The law to reduce the use of carryout bags in retail sales went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018. The law required stores to charge customers a minimum fee of 5 cents for carryout bags provided at shops. The law aimed to encourage consumers to bring reusable bags for shopping and to reduce the environmental impacts associated with single-use bags.

“We have made a difference in Suffolk County, and I believe we can make a difference around the world,” Spencer said.

“Suffolk County should be proud of this significant reduction of 1 billion plastic bags per year,” Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

“This is an exciting and meaningful reduction of our plastic waste,” she added. “As more and more evidence mounts about the dangers of plastic pollution it is critical that we change our behavior and reduce our use of plastics and that’s exactly what Suffolk County has achieved.”

According to the study, plastic and paper bag use at stores dropped 80 percent. More than 62 percent of shoppers are bringing their own bags or opting for no bag.  Consumers who still opt for single-use bags are using fewer of them per visit. And there are 41 percent fewer plastic bag litter found on local beaches.

$1M for Lyme, tick-borne illness research back in budget

BY GWENDOLYN CRAIG Glens Falls Post Star

GLENS FALLS — The New York State Senate reinstated $1 million in funding for Lyme and tick-borne illness research in the draft executive budget for 2019-2020.

While that money is still not guaranteed, the line item had been zero earlier this year.

Researchers including Lee Ann Sporn at Paul Smith's College and Holly Ahern at SUNY Adirondack have been advocating for the allocation.

The $1 million last year helped fund Sporn's unprecedented study of harvested deer blood in the Adirondacks that found a potentially lethal virus called Powassan is more widespread than previously thought.

Others, including the Adirondack Mountain Club, have also called on state leaders to secure the funding.

In an op-ed, Executive Director Neil Woodworth said research supported by the state funding has "resulted in new ways for people to protect themselves through clothing and lawn treatments, and through tick bio-controls."

With ticks found at higher elevations and in more northern areas of the country, the diseases and illnesses they carry are traveling with them.

The executive budget deadline is April 1.

CLEAN WATER FUNDS

Environmental organizations are also calling on state leaders to invest more funding in the Clean Water Infrastructure Act.

The Senate budget proposal includes $2.5 billion, and groups like the New York Public Interest Research Group, Natural Resources Defense Council and Riverkeeper are looking for the Assembly and Gov. Andrew Cuomo to approve that.

Studies show that over the next two decades $38 billion will be needed to update drinking water infrastructure across the state, and $36 billion will be needed to upgrade wastewater infrastructure.

"The Clean Water Infrastructure Act has funded critical projects in every region of the state, helping to address emerging contaminants in drinking water, fight harmful algal blooms, reduce sewage overflows that foul our waters, and more," said Adrienne Esposito, executive director for Citizens Campaign for the Environment, in a release.

"Despite the program's success, water infrastructure needs continue to vastly exceed available resources."

Suffolk County Reduces Plastic Bag Use By 1.1 Billion Bags

SOURCE:

https://patch.com/new-york/northfork/suffolk-county-reduces-plastic-bag-use-1-1-billion-bags

One year after Suffolk County imposed a 5-cent fee on single use plastic bags, usage has been drastically reduced. Do you use them less now?

By Lisa Finn, Patch Staff | Mar 21, 2019 7:52 pm ET

(Adrienne Esposito.)

SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY — One year after Suffolk County imposed a 5-cent fee on single use plastic and paper bags, government officials, environmentalists and others gathered for the unveiling of a report that indicates a drastic reduction — to the tune of 1.1 billion less — in the use of plastic bags.

Suffolk County Legislator William R. Spencer, local leaders and the Department of Health Services, evaluating the progress of the county's carryout bag law, said on Thursday that the findings, which include three sets of data, "indicate significant success in the county's effort to reduce the consumption and waste of single-use bags."

The report, measuring shoppers' bag choices, beach clean-up statistics and bag purchases by retailers before and after the implementation of the policy, "is an undertaking unique to Suffolk County. Such an extensive study has not been conducted in any other municipality throughout the country," organizers of the event said.

At the event, held at the Suffolk County Legislature building in Hauppauge, statistics on the sharp reduction in plastic bag use were revealed.

"Today we announced an historic accomplishment — Suffolk County reduced our plastic bag use by 1.1 billion bags last year," said Adrienne Esposito, executive director, Citizens Campaign for the Environment. "The legislation enacting a nickel fee changed public behavior in three ways — more people are bringing reusable bags to stores, more people are not using any bags, and those that are still using plastic bags are using much less. Our reports reveals an 80% reduction in plastic bag use in 2018 from 2017. Now, that's progress!"

According to data compiled, Esposito said, in 2017, the number of individuals using reusable bags was 5%; in 2018 it was 26%. In 2017, the number of people not taking any plastic bags was 20%, compared to 37% in 2018. And, while in 2017 the number of people using plastic bags was 71%, in 2018 it was 28%.

According to the "Annual Recycling Report, Progress of Single-Use Carryout Bag Reduction," on Jan. 1, 2018, the Suffolk County law requiring stores to charge a minimum of 5 cents for carryout bags took effect.

The 5 & 5 Education and Effectiveness Working Group, established by the Suffolk County Legislature to analyze the impact of the law, conducted a study to better understand bag usage behavior before and after implementation of the law, the report said.

"Teams were deployed to a supermarket, a pharmacy and a convenience store," in Suffolk County towns, the report said.

The teams were stationed outside of the establishments and the number of individuals using plastic, paper and/or reusable bags were counted. Hash marks were tallied as individuals were observed carrying products out of the stores, the report said.

In addition, data was collected at each location on one weekday night and one weekend day prior to implementation of the law, in November through December of 2017; and after implementation of the law, in November and December of 2018. Approximately 3,000 customers were observed in each study period; the study showed that use of reusable bags or no bags increased from 27.8% prior to implementation of the law to 60.1% after implementation of the law.

The data indicates that 32.3% of shoppers observed in our study have changed their behavior since implementation of the law and are now using reusable bags or no bags, the report said.

And the results have already been seen on cleaner shorelines.

The American Littoral Society*, northeast chapter, reported a 41.8% decrease in plastic bags, grocery and other combined, and a 41% decrease in paper bags collected from Suffolk County shorelines during volunteer cleanups in 2018 when compared with 2017.

The report also indicated that although the number of plastic and paper carryout bags collected was significantly lower, the number of volunteers participating in cleanups almost doubled in 2018 and the overall amount of debris collected in 2018 was significantly higher in 2018 than in 2017, the report said.

"Today's report shows that Suffolk County has achieved a drastic reduction in the scourge of plastic pollution, while at the same time reducing the use of paper bags by almost 80%," said Suffolk County Legislator Bridget Fleming. "It's an exciting turnaround. Our economy depends on how well we care for our environment, and this is great news on that score. Everyone involved should be very proud of the example we are setting for our region, the country — and the world.”

Controversial Sand Land mine to close within 8 years as part of state agreement

SOURCE:

http://longisland.news12.com/story/40136974/controversial-sand-land-mine-to-close-within-8-years-as-part-of-state-agreement

 

Controversial Sand Land mine to close within 8 years as part of state agreement

Posted: Mar 15, 2019 10:25 PM EDTUpdated: Mar 15, 2019 10:25 PM EDT

NOYACK -

A controversial sand mine on the East End where groundwater contamination was detected will have to close down as part of a new agreement with the state Department of Environmental Conservation.

The Sand Land mine is allowed operate in Noyack for eight more years. For years, different groups and residents have been fighting to close the mine for good.

According to the Town of Southampton and environmentalists, illegal activities were taking place at the mine for years, including the production and sale of mulch and topsoil.

Under the agreement, DEC officials say Sand Land must immediately stop the acceptance of vegetated waste to protect water quality, implement an extensive groundwater monitoring program and prevent any horizontal expansion of the mine.

Adrienne Esposito, Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says it's a complete reversal from a few months ago, when Sand Land was mandated to close and was denied an expansion.

Also under the agreement, the company cannot expand the overall size of the mine, but it can dig down an additional 40 feet.

Bob DeLuca, head of the Group for the East End, says the Suffolk Health Department found that the 50-acre site had contaminated the groundwater with heavy metals and toxins. He questions why the state would give the mine eight more years to operate.

News 12 repeatedly reached out to the company but did not hear back. But Brian Matthews, an attorney representing the company, told Newsday that the settlement is fair. He said it strikes a balance between his client's rights to conduct mining on the property, the department's obligation to ensure that it is done properly and everyone's interest in protecting the groundwater from contamination.

Students on LI, worldwide demand action against climate change

SOURCE:

http://longisland.news12.com/story/40136142/students-on-li-worldwide-demand-action-against-climate-change

Students on LI, worldwide demand action against climate change

Posted: Mar 15, 2019 5:32 PM EDTUpdated: Mar 15, 2019 5:32 PM EDT

MINEOLA -

Students on Long Island and around the world demanded action against climate change Friday.

From Washington, D.C., to the South Pacific and Stockholm, tens of thousands of students skipped school Friday "to teach a lesson" and share their fears about climate change.

The international "day of action" was organized on social media. The mission of the "Youth Climate Strike" organizers is to demand what’s been called a "Green New Deal." In the U.S., it includes 100 percent renewable energy by 2030, upgrading the current electric grid, and no creation of additional fossil fuel infrastructure.

Amelia Medved skipped class at Our Lady of Mercy Academy in Syosset to join the demonstration at the Mineola Long Island Rail Road station.

News 12 spoke with Pegeen Freise, a senior at Northport High School, via FaceTime as she and 17 other students returned from a Manhattan protest. She says there's no doubt they'd be able to bring about change if more people were interested in the environment.

Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says student-run movements are essential in keeping the pressure on politicians.

The United Nations secretary-general says he was inspired by the student climate strikers to call a special summit in September to deal with what he called "the climate emergency."

Sand Land mine agrees to settlement with state DEC that will close Noyack facility 

SOURCE:

https://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/sand-land-mine-dec-water-quality-1.28553057

 

Sand Land mine agrees to settlement with state DEC that will close Noyack facility 

Operators must close it within 8 years, but in the meantime vegetated waste can no longer be accepted, and a groundwater monitoring program must be implemented.

Operators of the Sand Land mine in Noyack have agreed to a legal settlement that includes implementing several actions to protect water quality. Photo Credit: Doug Kuntz

By Jean-Paul Salamancajeanpaul.salamanca@newsday.com  @JPaulSalamancaUpdated March 15, 2019 5:56 PM

PRINT  SHARE 

Operators of the Sand Land mine in Noyack have agreed to cease operations within eight years and implement several new actions to protect water quality, state Department of Environmental Conservation officials announced Friday.

DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos told Newsday the mining operation had agreed to conditions in a settlement addressing the facility’s operating permit that would place it on a path to closure.

The facility is operated by Wainscott Sand & Gravel of Bridgehampton. 

Residents opposed to the expansion of the Sand Land mine visited the site in August 2018 and were among environmental groups and Southampton officials protesting the mine's application to enlarge the site. Newsday / Chuck Fadely Photo Credit: Chuck Fadely

The company has submitted a revised five-year mining permit application documenting the settlement’s terms. On Wednesday, the agency will make that application available for a 30-day public comment period. After comments are reviewed, the DEC will decide whether to grant the company the permit. The company will have to close the mine eight years from the date the permit is issued.

The conditions include Sand Land immediately no longer accepting vegetated waste to protect water quality and the implementation of an extensive groundwater monitoring program at the site.

As part of that program, Seggos said the DEC will begin next week sending drilling teams to the site as part of a study to monitor groundwater in the mine vicinity and detect any changes in groundwater quality that could be attributed to the mine or other sources. Seggos said that if the study finds that groundwater conditions are worse than initially believed, the agency could close the mining site at an “immediate” pace.

Sand Land is also prohibited from any horizontal expansion of the mine, with the site to undergo a complete reclamation in less than 10 years to ensure its return to productive use, Seggos said. 

“There is nothing in the agreement that would prevent us from exercising our full authority, and we intend to aggressively oversee the process to make sure everything we outlined here is adhered to,” Seggos said.

The settlement also limits vertical expansion at the mine to no more than 40 feet and no greater than 100 feet above the water table, which DEC officials said are the strictest limitations the agency has enacted upon such a site. An independent third-party monitor will be chosen to oversee the mining operation, Seggos said.

Despite the agreement, Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Farmingdale-based Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said she found it “disturbing” that sand mining was still allowed at the site instead of its operators being forced to close it immediately.

“It’s upsetting that this settlement agreement happened without the town or the stakeholders involved and appears to be an undermining of any progress we made,” Esposito said.

Esposito was referring to a DEC order in September ordering Sand Land to cease mining in the wake of a June 2018 report by the Suffolk County Health Services Department that found elevated levels of manganese and iron in the groundwater at the site. The company is allowed to use the mine under State Administrative Review Act guidelines, DEC officials confirmed.

Brian Matthews, an East Hampton-based attorney representing the company, said Friday that the settlement is fair.

“In our view, the settlement strikes a balance between our client’s long-established rights to conduct mining on the property, the department’s obligation to ensure mining is done in a proper manner and everyone’s interest in ensuring that no groundwater contamination occurs at the site as a result of the operations,” he said.

D.E.C. to Let Sand Land Mine Stay Open

SOURCE:

https://www.easthamptonstar.com/Government/2019318/DEC-Let-Sand-Land-Mine-Stay-Open

 

D.E.C. to Let Sand Land Mine Stay Open

By Johnette Howard | March 18, 2019 - 2:48pm

Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele Jr. and environmental advocates reacted with strong dismay Monday to an announcement by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding a "comprehensive" settlement with the Sand Land Mine in Noyac that rolls back the timing and circumstances under which the industrial mine has to close, even though it has been found to be contaminating the area's water table.

Mr. Thiele blasted the deal.

"Sand Land is a proven polluter and lawbreaker," he said in a statement. "The Suffolk County Department of Health Services issued a report conclusively demonstrating that the groundwater under the mine is contaminated with pollutants associated with activities conducted at the mine. State courts have found that Sand Land has not complied with the Southampton Town zoning code. The state D.E.C. acknowledges that state mining regulations have been previously violated, resulting in a consent order and penalties."

"What are the consequences for polluting the groundwater and violating the law? The polluter was rewarded," Mr. Thiele added. "Despite intense community interest, the settlement was negotiated behind closed doors with no community involvement."

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, called the settlement "a mind-boggling backroom deal."

"The D.E.C. betrayed the public and is putting our groundwater at risk," Ms. Esposito said.

The settlement is an about-face from the D.E.C.'s decision last September for a notice of intent to modify the sand mining permit for Sand Land. That ruling, had it stood, would have provided for the closure of the mine and its reclamation within two years after its permit expired last November.

At the time, the ruling was hailed for potentially ending a two-decade-long fight between the mine's owner, John A. Tintle of Wainscott Sand and Gravel, and local elected officials, the Town of Southampton, and citizens and environmental groups such as the Noyac Civic Council, the Group for the East End, and Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

Mr. Tintle exercised his right to appeal the D.E.C.'s permit ruling, and the multifaceted settlement he and the D.E.C. reached — which also includes provisions for testing and monitoring of the site — would now allow Sand Land to not only continue mining at the site until 2027, but also expand its existing mine by a depth of 40 feet.

Reclamation of the site would now be pushed back to at least 2029.

"This is truly a disaster. Beyond disturbing," said Bob DeLuca, president of the Group for the East End. "This settlement stands as one of the most significant examples of bureaucratic incompetence that I have seen in my 30-plus years as an environmental professional, and its negative implications on water quality will be felt well beyond this site."

Sand Land sits over a Special Groundwater Protection Area that is important to the South Fork's long-term drinking water supply, not just that of nearby residents. The mine is in the deepest groundwater recharge area east of the Shinnecock Canal.

The Suffolk County Health Department released a study on June 29 that confirmed for the first time what Sand Land's critics had long argued: The company's mining and other operations such as the processing of vegetative waste, construction debris, compost, and mulch resulted in the release of iron, manganese, thallium, sodium, nitrate, ammonia, and gross alpha (radioactivity) into the aquifer and deep-water recharge area beneath the 50-acre site.

Iron was found at concentrations over 200 times the drinking water standard, and manganese was found at concentrations almost 100 times the drinking water standard.

But even the county's ability to conduct those tests at the mine was a litigious, drawn-out process.

Sand Land officials had initially agreed in 2015 to allow the county to do on-site well drilling and water testing, then rescinded permission. County officials ultimately went to court to gain access. That didn't happen until October of 2017, when the wells were finally drilled.

The county's lab completed testing of the samples in February of 2018.

A month later, the county's hydrogeologists finished quality control and validation processes and sent samples to the D.E.C. and the New York State Department of Health. About the same time, the Noyac citizens group and others hired their own expert to review the county's raw data, which they obtained via a Freedom of Information request. The expert's report came to the same general conclusions that the Suffolk County Health Department's report had: The plant is a hazard.

At the time, Sand Land's attorney, Brian Matthews of Matthews, Kirst & Cooley of East Hampton, responded by arguing that the county's findings were flawed.

Now that the D.E.C. has reversed course, the long fight is likely to resume, perhaps back in court.

The D.E.C. statement said Sand Land had submitted a revised mining permit application documenting all of the terms of the settlement that the D.E.C. will make available for public review and comment on Wednesday. After reviewing all applicable public comments, the D.E.C. will make a determination whether to issue the permit.

Mr. Thiele said he is among those who intend to fight. He called for the D.E.C. to hold public hearings on the mine, and demanded that the settlement with Sand Land be subjected to "the most stringent environmental review required by law."

Mr. DeLuca urged a strong response from Southampton Town Supervisor Jay Schneiderman, who, like Mr. Thiele, has supported the closing of Sand Land in the past.

"It will be critical for the Town of Southampton to quickly engage," Mr. DeLuca said, "to formally reject this settlement and stiffen its resolve to invoke its own authority under the mining law to prohibit any further expansion. There should be an immediate town board resolution to this effect, and it must be part of the record for the new permit application review."

"I see this as a big victory for Sand Land; I’m not seeing it as a big victory for the town," Mr. Schneiderman said Monday. "The other day we were looking at the [2018 D.E.C.] letter that said you’re done, no more mining, reclamation only. And that was exactly the result we were looking for. And then suddenly everything is turned on its head. And we’re all left scratching our heads. Today we’re looking at eight more years of sand mining. And it goes against the position the town has had in terms of not wanting to see additional intensification of mining at that site too."

"I need to talk about it with the town board and our legal counsel, as to what the town's response will be," he added. "But I was not happy."

"If the town is ignored," Mr. DeLuca said, "it must sue the D.E.C. to preserve its rights under the state mining law."

Great Lakes advocates speak out against Trump budget

SOURCE:

https://www.wxxinews.org/post/great-lakes-advocates-speak-out-against-trump-budget

Credit: Veronica Volk

Credit: Veronica Volk


Great Lakes advocates speak out against Trump budget

By Veronica Volk Mar 14, 2019


The GLRI funds habitat restoration like this cattail remediation project in Braddock Bay, New York.

Credit Veronica Volk / WXXI News

President Donald Trump’s budget proposal includes major cuts to Great Lakes restoration efforts.

The administration's 2020 budget proposal would cut funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative by more than 90 percent.

This initiative funds projects from habitat restoration to shoreline improvement programs, and is usually fully funded at $300 million a year. This budget would knock that down to $10 million.

Brian Smith is with the Citizens Campaign for the Environment in Buffalo. He said now is not the time to reduce efforts to restore the health and sustainability of the lakes.

"Not only would this stifle the tremendous progress that we're making on Great Lakes restoration," Smith said, "but it would put at risk the billions of investment we've already made to date."

This isn’t the first time the Trump administration has threatened to make deep cuts to Great Lakes funding. Smith said even though Democrats and Republicans have fought together to protect the lakes in the past, he’s not taking this lightly.

"We are really counting on Congress to once again step up work together and restore full funding to the GLRI," he said.

Not everyone is disappointed by the budget proposal. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is receiving more than $4 billion for its Civil Works projects, a portion of which will go to maintain federal shipping channels and navigation in Buffalo.

Why the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative matters to WNY

Why the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative matters to WNY

SOURCE:

https://buffalonews.com/2019/03/14/why-the-great-lakes-restoration-initiative-matters-to-wny/

By T.J. Pignataro|Published March 14, 2019

The benefits of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative are spread across Western New York.

They are apparent to those kayaking on a cleaned-up Buffalo River, fishing in Cattaraugus Creek or biking around Grand Island. The federal program has paid to remove toxins, rebuild habitat and restore wildlife species such as the bald eagle and lake sturgeon.

But now the Great Lakes program faces a budget cut, as it has the previous three years, with President Trump now proposing a 90 percent cut to the program in his 2020 fiscal budget.

Since 2010, more than $2 billion has been allocated among 3,400 restoration initiative projects -- up to $300 million a year shared by Great Lakes states.

"It puzzles me," said Niagara Falls Mayor Paul Dyster, who's also on the binational Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Cities Initiative board. "This program has received strong bipartisan support. The White House is increasingly isolated in calling for these cuts, but we can't take anything for granted."

"This has put all Great Lakes communities in a defensive and competitive mindset where we have to fight each other for the dwindling resources in order to achieve restoration in our own community," said Jill Jedlicka, executive director of Buffalo Niagara Waterkeeper.

 

Great Lakes Restoration

$75 million later, Buffalo River habitat restoration is complete

Tiny fish casts big shadow over health of Niagara River

Ambitious project begins to shed light on mysterious Lake Erie fishWhy scientists want to bring back the bloater chub to Lake Ontario

Ten initiatives restoring Buffalo-Niagara's Great Lakes

Here are some of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative programs in jeopardy across the Buffalo Niagara region.

Niagara River restoration

One of the biggest ongoing local projects involves the $2.7 million project to restore habitat at four locations.

The projects at Buckhorn Island State Park, Grass Island, Burnt Ship Creek and East River Marsh are designed to improve water quality and restore habitat for terrestrial and aquatic wildlife.

The state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation is implementing the four-year project, which started in 2017.

"The Niagara River is now on the cusp of moving forward with major restoration efforts," said Brian Smith, the associate executive director for Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

If the funding cuts happen, the Niagara River won't benefit environmentally like the Buffalo River has, Smith said.

The Niagara River was identified as an area of concern in 1987. Cuts to the program would delay its restoration for years, he said.

Buffalo River restoration

It took millions of initiative dollars to help rid the Buffalo River of a century’s worth of toxins. In the last decade, the program paid for the restoration of habitat at 13 sites along the river corridor between Old Bailey Woods and Canalside.

The next steps in the river’s restoration include assessing the relative success of those efforts.

One of those includes a more than $188,700 three-year survey of wildlife around the 13 sites to determine the restoration's effectiveness. Information gleaned from the survey, scheduled to run through 2021, could eventually be used to de-list the Buffalo River as a federal area of concern.

"The restoration of the Buffalo River, the revitalization of our waterfront, and the recovery of our water-based economy would not have happened without the GLRI," Jedlicka said. "The cost of Great Lakes restoration across the basin is estimated to be tens of billions of dollars. For comparison, the toxic sediment cleanup of the Buffalo River alone cost nearly $50 million, so to have an executive budget proposal that slashes the GLRI down to $30 million to be shared among eight Great Lakes states is incomprehensible."

Outer Harbor restoration

Last year, dredged material from the bottom of a cleaned-up Buffalo River was clean enough to use in environmental restoration work for the first time.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers restored a long-lost wetland connection and a fish passage between the northern area of Unity Island and the Niagara River.

Buffalo’s Outer Harbor is the next destination for clean sediment from the regular dredging of the river’s navigation channel. Plans call for a deep slip near Wilkeson Pointe and at the Union Ship Canal to be filled in with sediment to create shoreline wetland habitats.

About $83,800 in GLRI funds were scheduled to go to the Corps of Engineers to prepare project reports, scoping documents and administer public review efforts through 2022.

Native lake sturgeon

The lake sturgeon traces its ancestry back to the era of the dinosaurs.

It thrived in waters around the Buffalo Niagara region until overfishing, pollution and habitat degradation nearly obliterated the species during the late 19th and 20th centuries.

Efforts to restore the native fish, which scientists say still naturally reproduces in the Niagara River and Buffalo Harbor, have ramped up in Western New York and the Great Lakes under the initiative.

A nearly $90,000 project implemented through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to assess the health of the lake sturgeon and study its habitat preferences in the lower Niagara River was scheduled to continue through 2020. A separate project is designed to track the movements of lake sturgeon into Lake Ontario from the Genesee River using acoustic telemetry.

Bloater chub

The bloater chub is being restored to be eaten.

And, if efforts by state and federal environmental agencies are successful in restoring the native prey fish back to Lake Ontario’s food chain, it could be a vital boost for the native lake trout and the lake’s ecosystem at large, officials said.

The latest effort – a modest $36,615 project through the Fish and Wildlife Service – would further efforts to rear the bloater chub for stocking into Lake Ontario through 2020.

More fish protection

Myriad chemicals and toxins in Great Lakes waters threaten fish and aquatic life.

A three-year $600,000 project implemented through the state Department of Environmental Conservation involves collecting about 350 samples of young fish from the state’s waters and testing them for PCBs, mercury, flame-retardants and other chemicals to gauge the effectiveness of the state’s ongoing efforts to clean up the waters.

Results would also be used to determine the risks contaminants pose to fish and ascertain what additional environmental restoration remains to be done.

Nutrient loading

Reducing the amount of phosphorus and other nutrients from reaching Lake Erie is part of a binational agreement that includes five states and the province of Ontario.

Excessive nutrients get into the water from agricultural runoff and sewage overflows. They’re suspected of fueling the lake’s annual blooms of toxic algae.

In New York, the continuation of a $300,000 project to obtain data on nutrients and pathogens in tributaries emptying into eastern Lake Erie is ongoing through 2020 by the U.S. Geological Survey. That project is designed to help the state meet its nutrient reduction goals for Lake Erie.

Stormwater reduction

When heavy rains come, stormwater systems are overwhelmed.

That leads to high bacteria levels and summertime beach closings.

One way to capture stormwater before it reaches the beach is through green infrastructure projects.

Some $600,000 in GLRI funds were allocated over three years through 2020 to a pair of projects – at Lake Erie Beach Park in Evans and Point Gratiot Park in Dunkirk. The funds would go toward building green infrastructure areas that would reduce runoff at parks and beaches.

Owners of proposed Yaphank fish farm to pay $1.3M fine for illegal sand dig

SOURCE:

https://www.newsday.com/long-island/environment/illegal-mining-fish-farm-1.28530422

 

Owners of proposed Yaphank fish farm to pay $1.3M fine for illegal sand dig

BlueGreen Farms Inc. dug outside its 67-acre property without a DEC mining permit, within feet of the water table, and on privately owned property, officials say.

A view of the 67-acre BlueGreen Farms Inc.property on the northeast corner of Horseblock Road and Grucci Lane in Medford on Thursday. Photo Credit: James Carbone

By David M. Schwartzdavid.schwartz@newsday.com  @schwartznewsNYUpdated March 14, 2019 9:31 PM

PRINT  SHARE 

The owners of a long-proposed Yaphank fish farm have agreed to pay a $1.3 million penalty for taking more than 200,000 yards of sand and gravel without a permit, one of the largest actions for illegally digging sand in state history, the Department of Environmental Conservation said Thursday.

BlueGreen Farms Inc. has legally mined millions of cubic yards of sand out of the ground at the Yaphank site of the proposed fish farm. But the company, which has proposed raising sturgeon, striped bass and leafy greens like lettuce at the site since 2010, dug outside of its 67-acre property without a DEC mining permit, within feet of the water table, and on privately owned property, according to the DEC.

Regulators said they are trying to keep watch on the lucrative sand mining industry.

Members of local civic organizations at the site of Blue Green Farms construction in Yaphank on Jan. 26, 2012.  Photo Credit: Newsday/Ed Betz

"This sends a message," said regional DEC director Carrie Meek Gallagher. "We're trying to make it more than the cost of doing business."

Street prices for sand range from $16 to $30 a yard, with an average price of $20 a yard, according to the DEC.

Bob Del Col, general counsel, for BlueGreen Farms, said the price is closer to $10 a yard. He blamed unclear boundary lines, and said the company still one day hopes to build a fish farm as well as a hydroponic farm.

"Boundary lines in Eastern Long Island are, to say the least, very unreliable," he said. "From what I understand, the DEC came up with a boundary that we disputed. We’re allowed to do what we’re doing on this property. They disagreed."

He added: "It was cheaper just to end it."

He blamed government agencies for making it difficult to secure financing.

"We have spent millions of dollars on feasibility studies, on site plans, on financing, and all I’m going to tell you, for now, every step of the way we have been obstructed and impeded and various governmental agencies and municipalities have made building this thing impossible," he said.

In a statement later, he said the dispute was over a half-acre site, and the company admitted no wrongdoing.

According to the Order on Consent, signed by owner Eugene Fernandez of Hauppauge, BlueGreen Farms has to pay $125,000 and contribute $600,000 for a groundwater study being conducted with the U.S. Geological Survey. Another $625,000 fine is suspended, unless they don't comply with the order.

DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos said in a statement, "Illegal sand mining not only robs the people of Long Island of these precious resources, if done improperly, it can cause irreparable harm to our environment. New York State will continue our aggressive, on-the-ground oversight to ensure every facility complies with applicable rules and regulations."

Since the proposed fish farm was approved in 2010, DEC's Meek Gallagher said there has been "some skepticism about the whole proposal" and that the proposal was more about taking sand out of the ground than actually building a fish farm. But agricultural uses and construction projects are exempt from state mining law, she said. The facility has an agreement with the town of Brookhaven to excavate approximately 4.5 million cubic yards of sand in the first phase of its multiphase plan, the DEC said in a statement.

Brookhaven Town spokesman Jack Krieger declined to comment on the fine late Thursday but said a project on site was not approved.

The DEC said "millions of cubic yards of sand" have been mined from the property. While concrete foundations for the greenhouse were poured in 2013, no further development has taken place. In 2016, the DEC received a complaint that the company was mining outside of the allotted area. In November 2017, DEC issued notices of violations.

"Sand is an extremely valuable commodity. And Long Island has very good sand for all type of construction purposes," Meek Gallagher said. She said exemptions for construction and agriculture are "big concerns. People use these types of exemption."

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said she was "thrilled" with the fine.

 “The stealing of sand on Long Island creates craters on the landscape, destroys local ecosystems and makes our drinking water vulnerable to contamination,” she said.

State DEC: Brookhaven Town failed to contain foul stench from landfill

SOURCE:

http://longisland.news12.com/story/40117245/state-dec-brookhaven-town-failed-to-contain-foul-stench-from-landfill

State DEC: Brookhaven Town failed to contain foul stench from landfill

Posted: Mar 13, 2019 5:40 AM EDTUpdated: Mar 13, 2019 5:54 PM EDT

Play Video

Ad: 0:12

BELLPORT -

The state Department of Environmental Conservation say the Town of Brookhaven landfill violated air quality rules following months of foul-smelling complaints from residents.

The DEC says the town repeatedly violated state air-quality rules last December by failing to contain foul odors from the landfill.

Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, says the violations basically amount to "a slap on the wrist" for the town and don't fix the issue.

"People at the school are suffering," she says, referring to Frank P. Long Intermediate School, where some students and teachers have reported falling ill due to the landfill. Parents have been fighting for the school's closure.

Wendy Mijal pays out of pocket for her 9-year-old daughter to go to a neighboring district because of health concerns stemming from the landfill. She says she's outraged by the lack of action from the town.

The Town of Brookhaven issued a statement saying: "Working with the NYDEC, we have undertaken an aggressive program to cap and close this landfill and provide increased measures to combat odors traditionally associated with landfills."

Bill Would Ban 1,4-Dioxane, ‘Probable Carcinogen,’ In New York

 

 

Bill Would Ban 1,4-Dioxane, ‘Probable Carcinogen,’ In New York

SOURCE:

http://www.wshu.org/post/bill-would-ban-14-dioxane-probable-carcinogen-new-york#stream/0

By JILL RYAN  MAR 8, 2019

New York Assemblyman Steve Englebright, D- Setauket, speaks to environmental coalition groups during a rally at the state Capitol in Albany in 2016. Englebright recently introduced legislation in the state Assembly to ban the chemical 1,4-dioxane.

The New York State Assembly will consider a bill to ban 1,4-dioxane, a toxic chemical found in household products that has contaminated drinking water wells on Long Island.

The chemical is found in detergent, shampoo and soap and can be dangerous if consumed.

“1,4-dioxane is a toxic chemical that is listed by the U.S. EPA as a probable human carcinogen, which means it causes cancer. It specifically does damage to the liver and to the kidneys. This is a chemical we don’t want in our drinking water and we don’t want it in our common products,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director for the Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

The bill would require manufacturers to sell products with only trace amounts of the chemical.

Esposito said companies must do better to keep the public safe.

“The companies should be filtering it out before it gets into the product. The manufacturers can do this, very cost effectively, it’s just that right now the manufacturers choose not to.”

State Assemblyman Steve Englebright of East Setauket proposed the bill.

“We know that 1,4-dioxane is contaminating our drinking water on Long Island. We have serious contamination, more in fact on Long Island than in any other part of the state.”

The bill will go to the Environmental Conservation Committee next week and then on to the Assembly floor in the next couple of weeks.

Clean-up efforts are underway to remediate contaminated drinking water on Long Island.

Proposed bill would ban 1,4-dioxane from household products

Proposed bill would ban 1,4-dioxane from household products

SOURCE: Newsday

https://www.newsday.com/long-island/environment/1-4-dioxane-lawmakers-1.28161963

A separate proposal in the governor's budget would require manufacturers to disclose whether products contain carcinogens and other toxic materials.

Adrienne Esposito of Citizens Campaign for the Environment is seen in a 2018 news conference about Tide and other household products with high levels of 1,4-dioxane, a possible carcinogen. Photo Credit: Joseph D. Sullivan

By David M. Schwartzdavid.schwartz@newsday.com  @schwartznewsNYMarch 6, 2019 6:43 PM

PRINT  SHARE 

Manufacturers would be banned from selling household products such as body washes, detergents and baby products that contain a likely carcinogen found in Long Island’s drinking water under state legislation being pushed by environmentalists and water providers.

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, meanwhile, has a separate proposal that would require manufacturers to disclose whether products contain carcinogens and other toxic materials.

The chemical 1,4-dioxane has been found in Long Island drinking water wells, prompting water providers to warn that rates could possibly double to help pay for the $840 million in treatment costs.

While much of the groundwater contamination has been tied to the chemical’s use in industrial solvents, the chemical also is found in household products as a byproduct of the manufacturing process. It can end up down the drain and in the aquifer through septic systems or sewage treatment plants.

“We want to prevent more of this cancer-causing substance from being introduced into the Long Island water supply,” said Stephen Liss, counsel for Assemb. Steven Englebright (D-Setauket).

Engelbright introduced a bill Monday that would prohibit cleaning and personal care products from containing 1,4-dioxane, except in trace amounts.

State Sen. Todd Kaminsky (D-Long Beach) had introduced a similar ban in the Senate and plans to introduce identical legislation, his office said Wednesday.

Kaminsky said the bill “sends an important message that 1,4-dioxane is in a separate category. . . . It’s one chemical that Long Islanders are particularly sensitive to.”

Product manufacturers said they’re opposed to both the ban and the proposed labeling requirement, which would give broad authority to state regulators to write disclosure rules.

Industry representatives said the detections of 1,4-dioxane are so low that they’re safe for the public.

“Consumers can continue to use these products with confidence like they do millions of times every single day — safely and effectively,” said Brian Sansoni, spokesman for the American Cleaning Institute, which represents soap, detergent and cleaning supply manufacturers.

Environmental groups and water providers said while they support Cuomo’s proposal to label products with toxic materials, they’re pressing for the ban.

“It’s clearly counterproductive to filter this toxic chemical from our water, and then recontaminate it by using shampoos, laundry soaps, and bath products that are filled with 1,4-dioxane,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Farmingdale-based Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

The advocacy group in 2018 found 23 of 30 household products they tested contained 1,4-dioxane, which is a byproduct from the manufacturing process, including shampoos, stain lifters, body washes and detergents. That includes products that tested above the federal recommendation of levels for skin exposure.

Dennis Kelleher, spokesman for the Long Island Water Conference, which represents water providers, said in a statement, “We must end the cycle of polluting our soil, and subsequently our groundwater, with the use of products that contain 1,4-dioxane.”

He called Cuomo’s proposal for labeling “a step in the right direction, but it is not a solution.” He compared it to labels about the harm of cigarettes, but noted some people still smoke.

Cuomo in January announced the “Consumer Chemical Awareness Act” by saying “labeling on designated products will provide consumers with the information they deserve.”

The state regulators are negotiating with manufacturers and environmental advocates on the language, officials said.

The industry group Household & Commercial Products Association said New York should consider adopting California’s model for product disclosure “to create consistency for consumers.”

“Governor Cuomo has introduced an unworkable ingredient communication proposal in his 2019 budget that is extremely vague and leaves much of the regulation up to the discretion of the commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,” according to a statement from Owen Caine, an executive vice president for the Household & Commercial Products Association.

But environmental advocates said California’s minimum for reporting contamination is too high, allowing manufacturers to evade disclosure.

“It’s at astronomically high disclosure levels,” said Kathleen Curtis, executive director of Albany-based advocacy group Clean and Healthy New York.

About 1,4-dioxane

The chemical 1,4-dioxane, designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a likely human carcinogen associated with liver and kidney damage, is the top concern of drinking water providers because it has been found widely on Long Island, and is not removed through conventional treatment methods, water providers said. The man-made chemical is found in industrial solvents and in trace amounts in cosmetics, detergents, shampoos and other home care products.

Environmentalists and health advocates said New York State should implement a new maximum contaminant level as quickly as possible to protect the public. Water providers have asked for an extended timeline to install treatment.

MRF operators come out in force against New York bottle bill expansion

SOURCE:
wastedive.com

https://www.wastedive.com/news/mrf-operators-come-out-in-force-against-new-york-bottle-bill-expansion/549529/

Dive Brief:

  • New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's proposed expansion of the state's bottle bill to include non-alcoholic, uncarbonated drinks has run into well-coordinated opposition from the recycling industry and county officials. Following the release of a flyer deeming it a "threat to recycling" in February, opponents hit the capitol in Albany with concerted lobbying this past week.

  • Speaking to the mechanics of maintaining profitability in a post-National Sword business environment, Sims Municipal Recycling (SMR), Waste Management, Republic Services, Waste Connections, Casella Waste Systems, the NWRA and others claimed that the proposal would cut average inbound commodity values by $14.23 per ton due in part to the loss of PET containers.

  • The New York State Association of Counties (NYSAC) has also come out against the proposal, echoing the recycling companies' proposal for a glass-only expansion that would target “wine and liquor bottles, hard cider bottles, and non-alcoholic glass beverage containers." The Natural Resources Defense Council confirmed to Waste Dive it shares the same position.

Dive Insight:

Cuomo's bottle bill plans were introduced in January, alongside a plastic bag ban, in his FY20 budget proposal. Despite arguments that expanding eligibility to non-alcoholic beverage containers such as juice, tea-based beverages and sports drinks will decrease New York’s contribution to landfills and incinerators, the governor's proposal is running into common and concerted industry opposition.

The 10 service providers that signed onto the February flyer claim to process more than 80% of New York's recyclables. According to MRF operators, many of whom have been spending more capital to create cleaner streams, diverting valuable plastic and aluminum containers "pulls the economic rug out from under these investment investments and weakens this infrastructure." Glass, on the other hand, is largely unprofitable, with "less than 20%" being made into new products.

In its rebuttal, SMR outlined another potential spillover effect caused by the plausible reduction of valuable plastics from curbside pickups. Because ongoing recycling of thermoform plastics depends on industry’s ability to supplement the mix with a requisite share of bottle plastic and other PET, a drop in the availability of PET could hamper New York City's ongoing rigid plastic recycling efforts. The company believes this undermines local "zero waste" efforts, concluding that "continuing to remove materials of value from the curbside mix jeopardizes the entire residential recycling model."

While the opposition messaging has thus far garnered more attention, Cuomo's proposal does have its supporters — the Container Recycling InstituteNew York League of Conservation Voters, Citizens Campaign for the Environment and the New York Public Interest Research Group are among multiple organizations that have come out in favor. In one point of agreement, they too would like to see more glass containers included.

With lawmakers in neighboring Connecticut considering a similar bottle bill expansion, the battle in New York will test not just the merits of Cuomo’s appeal to “protect the environment for future generations,” but also the strength of pro-bottle bill arguments in a tightening recycling market. New York's state budget legislation is due for approval by March 31.

LI Environmentalists Say EPA Acting Too Slowly On PFAS Regulation

LI Environmentalists Say EPA Acting Too Slowly On PFAS Regulation

SOURCE:
http://www.wshu.org/post/li-environmentalists-say-epa-acting-too-slowly-pfas-regulation#stream/0

By JILL RYAN  FEB 15, 2019

The EPA plans to propose a drinking water standard by the end of the year to address harmful chemicals found in drinking water across the country. But environmentalists are skeptical.

Chemicals known as PFAS have been used to extinguish fires since the 1940s. But over time PFAS have seeped into the drinking water of nearby communities.  

Susan Bodine, assistant administrator of the EPA’s Office of Eenforcement and Compliance Assurance, said PFAS is a known carcinogen, but the EPA needs more time to study its effects.

Executive Director Adrienne Esposito of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment said it’s too long of a process to establish a drinking water standard.

“We are very disturbed by the continued delay. This is a highly toxic chemical and unfortunately the EPA is moving at a pre-global warming glacial speed to regulate it.”

Esposito said the EPA may need a couple more years before regulations can be made.